Which is the better trilogy?
Prequels vs sequels
Carter Edwards
Other urls found in this thread:
Hudson Russell
Sequels are better because the actors perform better. The prequels are shit, but the plot makes more sense.
Christopher Thompson
Prequels only in the sense that they come off better than the Sequels, which is a low bar to hurdle over
Levi Martin
>Sequels are better because the actors perform better.
No they don't. Prequels' wooden acting comes off more genuine than reddit-tier quip-acting of the Sequels.
Tyler Mitchell
Prequels by far, the Sequels didn't even have a vision behind them they were just churned out
Connor Garcia
>Sequels are better because the actors perform better.
Noah Sullivan
Sequels
Brody Moore
Sequels are better at being nonsensical, left wing, cliche, unoriginal jew poop
Luis Long
Prequels, this shouldn't even be a question.
Benjamin Morales
I guess the Sequels had better clones
Wyatt King
The Phantom Menace - shit
Attack of the Clones - shit
Revenge of the Sith - alright
The Force Awakens - good
The Last Jedi - alright
The Rise of Skywalker - shit
Sequels
Mason Martin
revenge of the sith is god tier though
Asher Walker
Prequels = kino
Sequels = cringe
Justin Thomas
watch the RLM reviews
Easton Brooks
Lol no.
Caleb Ortiz
This.
Nolan Thompson
No thanks, Mike
Nicholas Gonzalez
Prequels, because while weak on their own they improve the original trilogy
Jack Ramirez
The prequels tried to do something new and sucked. The sequels tried to copy the originals and somehow fucked up anyways.
Jackson Bennett
Watch their praise of The Force Awakens and know that they've been utterly discredited.
Angel Kelly
cringe
Henry Sanchez
Wyatt Harris
What was Mark Hamill thinking here? Is it true the movie had been greatly changed in post production?
Jaxson Ross
why