"All Men are Evil" *THE MOVIE*

>only white men though, the one black guy in the movie is super good and omg their big dicks are so yummy

Gotta love the subtlety

Attached: AlexGarlandMenPoster.jpg (259x384, 62.2K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pt81CJcWZy8
m.youtube.com/watch?v=FeQ6y_GKHCg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I watch bnwo porn too op

Checked but you're a retard

There is is. Right there.

The iconic Chudseethe.

Oh boo hoo nigga

Why is the husband black? Why are all a24 soiburns the same?

>the one black guy in the movie is super good
Haven’t seen the movie but I thought that character supposed to be an asshole and manipulative partner that killed himself when he didn’t get his way.
I don’t think OP has seen the movie either, though.

What the fuck are you talking about?
Did you even watch the trailer?
youtube.com/watch?v=pt81CJcWZy8

Literally every white guy is creepy and evil except the black guy who the white woman fucks. Last Night in Soho all over again.

Get a job.

This, why aren't chuds praising our black male white female movie?

Fuckin kill yourself or point out one inaccurate statement I made you motherfuckin shitstain

Why are you bothered by this?

>Simping for Alex Garland
I don’t care if you fags liked Ex Machina, Garland has always had a flawed, broken outlook on life. You can see this with his earlier works like The Beach (which he didn’t direct but he wrote the book)
m.youtube.com/watch?v=FeQ6y_GKHCg

wypippo seething ITT
love to see it

Why do you think it's not completely forced you fucking idiot? I'm not him by the way.

>confirmed for not seeing the movie
The husband is abusive.

It literally would make no fucking difference if the black guy was a white guy because then you'd be complaining that every white man in the movie is evil. You assume malice from these people when in reality it was just a random ass choice that you're getting ass hurt over because you're exactly like an sjw from 2014 just In reverse. You and people like you are fucking annoying all you guys do is bitch and complain about perceived transgressions that 70% of the time aren't even accurate and 20% of the time aren't usually malicious. The 10% that actually needs criticizing you're barely there for

Are you saying I'm incorrect that this movie is literally "all white men are villains and all black men are good" or are you saying that this is a good thing?
If it's the former then you have no fuckin clue what you're talking about and are retarded.
If it's the latter then you need to kill yourself immediately, because you know damn well that this is just raping cinema to deform it into a fuckin HR presentation.

#YesAllMen

I don't think the movie is going to be praising his black excellence I doubt they're going to talk about how slighted the black man is I guarantee it's just going to be a random thing that is barely touched upon why do you assume the worst out of these people

Movie is coming out 5 years too late. This fat millennial man hating shit is passe and too on the nose now, but would have been viewed as "an important commentary on gender relations" in 2017 around Girlbusters and Get Out

I might torrent this if I get confirmation that the ugly whore from im thinking of ending things (this movie sucked unmitigated ass) gets raped in it.

>it was just a random ass choice
He's retarded but so are you

>You assume malice from these people when in reality it was just a random ass choice
Not random. Learn to recognize patterns.

Attached: 1630942240654.png (1024x1024, 1.16M)

nta but the movie just has a majority white cast with a black husband. You need more evidence to assume that a agenda is being pushed then the random aside that the husband happens to be black.

>random
You know what casting calls are, right?
They specifically got white men for all those roles.

>they accidentally made every white guy evil and creepy and the only black guy in the movie good
You don't actually believe this, you're just shitposting now.
THE PEOPLE WHO MAKES THIS SHIT LITERALLY BRAG ABOUT IT!
Even THEY'RE not hiding it, who the fuck are you kidding you absolute dipshit????

based bad faith argumenter

Oh it's absolutely forced and outrageously stupid. It's going to make dumb liberals think that black men are safe. It's going to make dumb liberal women prefer black men. It's going to add racial boundaries to politics and ensure that one group maintains a strong white preference while another group is beaten by their statistically abusive husbands and exist in one of the higher percentages of failed marriage because a movie told them to.
Now why are you bothered by any of this?

That honestly makes it more suspicious.

>Garland has always had a flawed, broken outlook on life.
wow in that case he DEFINITELY won't be popular here.

No no I bet you're right it's much more realistic to assume that Hollywood just wholly hates white people and that every creative designer lead to casting director to actual director wants to push liberal bullshit agendas every single time there's a minority.

I don't know why they made the husband black but it doesn't really fucking matter. Same reason it doesn't matter that they made the guys wife in the Sonic movie Black. I think you guys need to stop being schizophrenics and learn how to fucking enjoy a movie and if there's actual woke bullshit in it call it out. Not pearl clutch over a movie having a black husband be with a white wife

>just stop noticing things
Quora is noticing too nowadays. It’s not just here.

>A random ass choice
Which is why literally every other evil character we see is a white guy right? I’m going to assume that you hopefully find films with dog shit social commentary like Karen and Don’t Look Up to be terrible, so why not Men?

I saw the trailer for this shitshow last time I was in a cinema. Now I understand all the mass shootings. I legit wanted to shoot the place up too.

it's probably not random, but to demarcate (in the audience's minds) her dead ex from the guy who is playing the rest of the cast.

because Garland actually knows roughly what he's doing and the events of the main plot will be a metaphorical/psychological exploration of the backstory and he felt it would be better to make that less obvious if possible.

>person of colour unable to use English properly
My mind is blown.

Probably because you're schizophrenic
What was bad faith about what I said
For one thing we have absolutely no idea if the movie has every white man being evil. Secondly like I said what would change if the black husband was all of a sudden White? Probably fuck all. But if they were supporting that oh well white men are just evil in the black guy is the innocent victim we probably see more evidence in the film hitting on the theme of like black persecution or something tangentially related to that. To assume the directors we're sitting in the fucking chairs and thinking oh yes we're going to make this movie we're also going to make every white man evil and the black guy good, like why what point would that be? Are they virtue signaling they like black people? In the most fly like subtle way possible? That's fucking autistic.
I don't know why they made the husband black it could have been for any number of reasons. But if that's the only case supporting the idea that it is a film about white men being evil. I don't find it to be very compelling evidence
Or just more white men auditioned considering Hollywood is majority White

lol knowing Any Forums the poster you quoted is white.

Put two and two together.
The people who make this shit openly and proudly spew absolutely vile anti-white and misandrist filth on every media outlet,
they literally make rules mandating leftist agenda in every movie,
and you see the result of it in the films.
They see race in everything, and consider race with every decision. To act like this decision was totally random is absolutely disingenuous.
You know exactly wtf they're doing. 10 years ago for some reason there wasn't any such "whoopsies, we accidentally made an anti-white propaganda film totally by chance"

Attached: EhbwIvGUYAAGAoR.jpg (1004x1200, 148.15K)

>you’re just schizo
What a cop out. BMWF relations are extremely rare outside of media. Maybe you’re just oblivious.

It's not my argument obviously virtue signaling happens but it's done a lot more obvious. I saw people say the fucking Sonic movie was woke here because the human character donut Lord or whatever the fuck his name is has a black wife. That's not woke. I saw people say Doctor strange in the multiverse madness was woke because America has that fucking fag pin and two gay moms. I don't think that's woke either. Ironically enough Captain marvel had a lot of men in that film be pieces of shit too but no one was focused on that being woke they were focused on Brie Larson being a bitch in press interviews
We have no idea if every other character is a white guy. But even if they are that leaves us to ask why they got a black guy specifically. He could have auditioned and they decided to give it to him because they thought he was good or maybe they wanted some more representation in the movie. Plenty of likely options but to assume it was because they wanted to virtue signal about how great black people are by having a black husband when he's almost inconsequential to the plot of the film is pretty far fucking fetched for me
Maybe so like I said there's a myriad of reasons as to why but the ones being offered up like the film is just trying to shit on white men is not likely to me