Why did this movie glorify Scandinavians as savages and mud hut dwellers? Chinese already had kingdoms by then.
Why did this movie glorify Scandinavians as savages and mud hut dwellers? Chinese already had kingdoms by then
Asher Gonzalez
Blake Wood
Because otherwise someone would have to reveal that Russia has rightfully controlled Kiev since the movie’s setting
Nathan Parker
The failure of Colonialism was not committing 100% genocide against non whites.
Cooper Smith
Glorify how exactly? I felt like it just told a story
Nathan Moore
Depicting something is endorsing it.
Jackson Perez
Is that why your mom depicted herself having sex with me?
Xavier Wilson
there was no russia at the time, lmao
Parker Garcia
because we literally were kings and such
Zachary Perry
Where exactly were they glorified?
Liam Miller
>Chinese
Nice try Chang. You mean Italians
Brandon Hernandez
Kievan Rus was founded in 882, user
The movie starts in 895
Colton Baker
It was 892, Rome was at its peak 100s of years prior. It's not like China was way ahead of the curve when it came to Europe.
Christopher Clark
Rome already fell by 437. What's left was some zombie meme kingdom
Parker Gray
nobody who makes movies knows anything about history... or about anything at all.
Aaron Campbell
this
and neither do they care
Jason Bennett
>send your most rabid and hardened criminals to colonize the island closest to hell
>they mate with the wildlife instead
Isaiah Foster
By that logic America already fell in 1945.
Tyler Gray
why did they choose this aesthetic? The braces and contact lenses, looks weird af
Aiden Ward
Truly unfortunate, yes.
Carter Morris
Henry Evans
As if you ever had the power to do it. You were only able to colonise the lands you did like in India through Jew trickery. Genocide would have exposed you.
Brandon Richardson
Jace Powell
Also no wonder why nordcucks seethe so much against Jews.
James Stewart
>braces
Alexander Hall