Is gone with the wind really that good?

Is gone with the wind really that good?

Attached: top10.png (467x365, 78K)

Adjusting for inflation is a Jewish scam, everyone knows you could buy a private island back in 1939 for under a buck.

in 1939 most people went to see it because Rhett says the word damn.

Where is Morbius?

1965 chads, we're here to stay.

Bros, not like this

gone with the wind is trash and avatar deserves to be 1st

it is a genuinely excellent film and the modern digital Technicolor transfers look amazing.

t. PC liberal.

only good when avatar does it
gone with the wind star war endgame don't count

it's pretty fucking great bros

wtf is doctor zhivago

Only eleven movie held the title.

Attached: List of highest-grossing films - Wikipedia.png (589x579, 50.57K)

Gone with the Wind played in theatres for like 15 years, Avatar played for 6 months at most.

Yeah.

*mobies
It's also interesting if you look at the list of the highest grossing movie franchises. Of course we have to take into account they count Avengers and MCU separately but besides that it's interesting to find something like Twilight on the list. In fact the amount of dead franchises means the list will change a bit in the coming years. Jurassic Park, Godzilla and Superman may move up a few spots. Fast and the Furious may jump into top five.

Cameronbros... it's our decade, nothing will stop us

Attached: 5rt5etyetrdstg.png (754x539, 45.45K)

Yes. The scene wear Rhett forces himself on Scarlett is kino

Are theaters much less popular? I thought shit like Endgame won because even adjusted for inflation they have shit like the Chinese market and stuff as well.

Don't know if it's fair to give Avatar credits for sneaking back into the #1 spot though, as that was a petty rerelease to steal steam from Endgame.

This user is correct, to elaborate further you can't really compare the landscape of cinemas at the time of its release with cinemas now. You didn't have TVs, you didn't have rental services, if you could watch it in your own home you were probably a millionaire with your own theater. It had to stay months, multiple releases and theaters could easily put it up for a few weeks in rotation with other movies. I'm sure it was a popular film at the time and that helped it in staying on the rotation but you can't exactly do that nowadays except for a handful of movies like say LotRs.

It might've been a failure but it wasn't. Those re-releases can be hit or miss. The 3D re-release of Star Wars was a bust while the one for Jurassic Park around 2012 or 2013 helped push the movie past 1 billion mark.

It's been re-released again soon prior to the premier of Avatar 2. 3 billies is in sight

Attached: 43633.png (795x615, 106.78K)

What does this mean? Are you implying all the avatar sequels are not going to do as well as the first one