Could they really just fire somebody just for going half an hour over on their lunch...

Could they really just fire somebody just for going half an hour over on their lunch? Didn't workers have rights back then?

Attached: onehourphoto.jpg (750x420, 117.87K)

did you even watch the movie

fuck off with your commie propaganda
here in america we have freedom and that includes the freedom to treat low skill workers as we see fit
god bless the usa

i hate minimum wage workers and poors

Yeah but capitalism has led to open borders. Workers are members of a community, the alienation of workers and the poltical tribalization of basic rights for workers is what has pushed proletariats to the left and voting for the same parties that push open borders.
>t.economist

No capitalism didn't, the state did.

I'm aware he took a few extra copies so what? You gonna tell me the kids working at the pizza joint never help themselves toa free slice? It's expected.

What are you talking about. That's not why he was fired

>incel is angry about chad caring more about getting his dick sucked than being a family man
>incel chud ends in jail

lmao

American workers had far more freedom than the commies and socialists did, they were also paid more and were allowed to choose their own jobs

Free markets lead to open borders. Free trade is synonmous with the movement of workers IE immigration. Communism was stupid, but it destroyed the pricing mechanism which led the soviet nations to being poor. Minorties only care about money. Do you think nonwhites come to america because they love DA AMERICAN REVALUTION? You're looking at it from a very simple non accelerationist view. MArx was pro free trade even if he was a commie because he saw it could be used to distabalize nations

BASED. GOD BLESS AMERICA, BROTHER.

you're obviously a brainlet neoliberalist who has never read a book on economics.

Saying you're an economist is proclaiming you're a retard.
t. published in UTD journals, so I know what I'm talking about.

Okay, believe me or don't. Free trade leads to free movement of people. Capitalism will inevitably lead to free trade especially in a world where capital can be digitalized.

Attached: 1627513560676.jpg (666x666, 47.13K)

He was fired because he was stealing photos for 10+ years. The real question is why did they let him finish out the week there after they fired him?

He was also stealing every time he spaced out and stopped working.

If you still believe there is a clear distinction between capitalism or not capitalism, you're already too far gone. True salvation lies in understanding what persists through any system: Lemons, Gresham's law, in-group preference, the tragedy of the commons, and more.

They can fire you for no reason at all in the US, depending on the state

>Free trade leads to free movement of people
Not if you have laws to management that free movement, and you enforce them.

lol

I agree that economics is tertiary to identity, Racial and ethnic tribalism will always in the end win the day. But you're missing the point. Communism inherently leads to poverty. Nonwhites do not care about white people. They only come here because they want money. So if communism creates poverty, what incentive do they have to go to communist countries? Look at the post soviet nations. They are on the rise. America is on the decline as it most of western nations. You're trying to save a utopian ideal of capitalism. Same way boomer conservatives and classical liberals say shit like modern feminism isn't REAL feminism. It is, and its exponential. Even if we went back to the 90's girl power seperate but equal feminism, it would still eventually lead to the matriarchal madness we see now after a couple years. Likewise, capitalism always will have an earlier stage middle stage and late stage. Death of empires always come.

Based

Attached: 1651446781584.webm (1000x562, 2.94M)

Terrifying. Imagine allowing employers to choose who they employ.

True though, innit. If that's your issue with capitalism, understand that it's not a guaranteed consequence.

It won't work. money corrupts. We see how it worked out in america and most western nations now. You're trying to save a theory by a WHAT IF? It hasn't worked. Capitalism leads to centalization of power both through wealth and the fact that capitalism leads to technological explosions in the short term. While that can be good to a degree, technology has also enslaved us. The elite are more powerful in theory then ever. So basically
Capitalism leads to technocracy, which leads to open borders because the elite globalists need to sustain their power both by making more capital via consumption and bringing in cheap labor, These people are also desperate and lower in iq. This leads to consumerism, nonwhites tend to be bigger consumers than whites. They also vote for open borders, against pro gun laws and edicts, and the general tribalism of having mass migrations tears the society apart.

retard, the state is controlled by capital. immigrant labour lines the pockets of the rich. its only the poor that lose out.

>It won't work. money corrupts
Power corrupts. You're talking about humans now, not the actual economic systems. If a communist ruler wants more labor, he'll allow "the free movement of people" too.