Do architects like to destroy history/build affronts to art in your cunt?

I love how the majority of outdated architecture fanbois aren't architects, public planners or even civil engineers.

Attached: smh.png (657x527, 19.16K)

If they build NEW traditional architecture, no one would have an issue.

The problem isn't "new".
The problem is that these buildings are UGLY af.

>t. draw square boxes on a map

Yeah. They knocked down the building on the right to build the one on the left.

Attached: No-1-Poultry.jpg (640x480, 72.32K)

but why?

public planners and civil engineers only care about efficiency, and costs, which is why 99% of modern cities are bland square concrete boxes.

Architects have their head too high up their asses to know what people actually like, and are always trying to "reinvent" shit, and coming up with ridiculous desings.

in many cases yes

That is fucked up. They really do want to erase all cultural identity

>but why?
An excuse to build the worlds largest model of the solar system.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden_Solar_System

The whole world must look the same for their globalisation dream to fully work.

modernist architecture isn't new, its as old as art deco and only slightly older than art nouveau.

It looks good though

I like them both. but there is plenty of shitty post war architecture worth demolishing in London. The English don't give a shit about there archectural heritage. there far worse than us. At least the stuff we destroy is busted beforehand. Just look at google maps. Its full of it.

Attached: LONDON.png (1365x1276, 2.75M)

niggas didn't render that shit properly lmaoooo

more like old thing that is is good, is good
new thing that is bad, is bad

if it wasn't cheap and tacky it would be fine. firstly they need to be willing to spend more money. secondly they need to develop some actual fucking taste that isn't hurrdurr art/architecture is just tasteless novelty with no concern for aesthetics or function or longevity.

>NOOOOO YOU DON’T ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT YOU WANT. EVERYONE ELSE IS A RETARD EXCEPT FOR MEEE
friendly reminder that this restarted design dumps accumulated ice and snow on people, sending them to the hospital because the retard designers didn’t think about fucking SNOW in fucking CANADA

go back to your country permenently nigger

>Architect: Daniel Libeskind (USA).

Every fucking time

>Architect: Frank Gehry (USA, formerly Canada)

Attached: ED-AI649_AGO1_G_20081203125049.jpg (553x369, 95.06K)

Whats yo mama doin in dere?

Attached: Screenshot_20220717-125449.jpg (298x313, 35.67K)

You bloody son of bastard bitch I will rape you benchod

>straight lines and right angles are... bad!
but all classical shit looks the same so that's kind of a moot point

>but all classical shit looks the same
no it doesn't you massive bellend

These are all really cool

Hating modern architecture is the biggest sign of a brainlet

Attached: WMU20Mark20Syke_2-CMSTemplate_B1VQL0f.jpg (2000x1333, 317.99K)

would expect nothing less from an ikeanigger. most soulless country in existence.

Modern architecture definitely has far greater variation than classical architecture lol, especially when it comes to colour

The only legitimate criticism of modern architecture imo is the overusage of glass, but that's mostly because it's so cheap and environmentally friendly

Attached: Modern-Architect-Rio-House.jpg (436x436, 61.4K)

looks like shit

>most soulless country in existence.
nigga you live in the uk, most your houses looks like this

Attached: red-brick-houses-in-lincoln-lincolnshire-uk-europe-C69821.jpg (1300x956, 317.46K)

Aren't there countries that are doing the opposite right now?

SOVL

modern architecture has good use of space but it totally lacks all visual elegance. they should just get over themselves and make buildings that look nice

except modernism today doesnt have anything to do with the modernism from the 60-70s-80 or with the one from 1920s-1930s(streamline moderne in this case)