True suffering map
True suffering map
>1000-26106
kek
>but we need more population growth
Bangladesh is thoomin
should we get rid of blue?
LatAMs do NOT suffer
This map doesn't make a distinction between the actual living conditions of the average person. It would be better to chart out the average or median people / km^2 surrounding the dwellings of a person.
For instance Brazil is probably relatively more dense compared to other countries than this graph actually shows, same for Sweden.
26106 is Monaco
That map doesnt mean shit, when its just average for whole countries
>states are countries dude
>most dense non-meme country in Europe
I suffer
0-10 is the only acceptable one
>umm actually, only 11% of England is concrete. We are not 'full', you fucking gammon.
lol that was the first thing i thought of
>have you seen how many USELESS FIELDS there are? we could build tower blocks for war orphans
>actually if we grinded everyone into fine powder and put them into giant silos all over the country we could fit an extra 15 billion people
More sparsely populated = more suffering. Low population density makes everything less profitable because you need more infra with less tax payers funding it
Fake data, Indonesia is empty af
Everyone is more or less just jammed into London.
>densetugal
Most of South America is barely inhabited
looks that more than 90% of east coast inhabitants are brazilians
Why is the amazon being deforestation then chud?
The nordeste seems overcrowded especially the coast
>being deforestation
Honestly, how much of a foul piece of excrement do you have to be to look at fields and small farming villages and think 'hmm, how many Barratt boxes and immigrants could we accommodate instead?'
Problem?
I like to immediately remind them of the climate crisis and to be more fucking green minded
Too many people. Needs to be cut down
It isn’t as bad as your media portrays.
The interior of Nordeste is an hot and arid biome, so naturally in the past people preferred to live in the coast.