India vs. Africa

Which one has more potential? They have almost the same population.

Attached: afric_india_0.jpg (600x376, 34.43K)

Most of Africa is ruled by retarded leaders who invest a dangerous amount of money to retarded projects, only to cancel them 6 years later and they will move on to another low IQ project.

India is one country and africa is dozens, and its fairly obvious the one where things can get more easily done because they're a "unified" population will do better. Africa needs an african version of the EU

Both are black

So just like India?

What do you mean?

There are some indian in africa who are in the top elite, which reminds a lot of chinese in sea and jews in west country

This is not a fair comparison at all.

Africa is 50 something countries mutt stop making retarded posts

Obviously Africa has more potential

>some indian in africa who are in the top elite
Financially yes, socially or politically outside of those Indian Ocean island states no.

India has an IQ advantage, but we can fix that by sending white people to Africa and breed chocolate women into a superior mixed race.
NO ANGLOS allowed, otherwise it will be Afroamerican Uruks who are good at killing and raping, and nothing else.

Chinese already doing that they have deficit of females in their homeland, future is blessian, Asian iq+black physical strength would be super combination unironically

Attached: chinese-man-with-black-african-women-15.jpg (478x400, 45.27K)

India and Africa are polar opposites of each other on a social organisational level

One has little to no social organization, other is a fucking mess from all the social organization it did throughout millennia.

One needs a "Great Reset", total purge, dekulakization, Soviet style, the other needs someone to bring them the fucking wheel.

Kek Boris Johnson did that with the garden Bridge while mayor of London

India wins by default because Africa has no potential whatsoever.

I've seen that projects in Africa get executed much faster than in India. What's your take on this?

I assume he meant Indian born businessmen conducting business there. I have an uncle in Rwanda
africa is very bleak. if they survive past the coming food ahortages they will have to nationalise their resources if they want to do anything, and that looks unlikely between corrupt officials and the threat of coups etc

africa doesn't have a landlord class or aristocratic class.
Babu-Lundlord alliance will ensure nothing gets done without them interfering and minting money. Has been the case for generations btw.

African projects have the other problem: they aren't made by Africans. I was seeing CGTN showing off the train they built for Nigeria. Its not even HSR. Its literally ICF coaches which Indian factories can churn out daily. And Nigeria is like one the better countries when it comes to resources and talent.

commie?

Not him but probably due to the fact these "African" Projects are fully done by Chinese from bottom worker to manger & believe me they know their shit while Indian politicians & their civil servant pets are as sub human as shown in nazi German propaganda

Most Pajeets are communist because they believe in social justice, workers rights etc.

I'm an advocate for communism because I believe that millions of pajeets need to k1lled (especially lundlords and 2 bit aristocrats), land nationalized, and peasants starved to famine to reduce the population to 800 million, and a totalitarian no nonsense government to take control.

>africa doesnt have an aristocratic class
kys haplo incest rapebaby

Africa has no long-term horizon in anything it does. Whether it's an ambitious national project or an individual endeavour we'll just let it peter out or fail. This is why there is no proper organization. It's doomed to fail.

Most Pajeets are socialist*

Holy Mother of cringe, go back to wherever you came from. Newfag

Attached: pepe-cringe.gif (498x334, 56.48K)

Attached: D9434504-FE96-4D44-8709-2AFE883CC4B0.png (1032x2291, 673.13K)