Neanderthals mog modern humans HARD

Neanderthals mog modern humans HARD

Attached: .jpg (835x1255, 158.08K)

Sure thing right neander bros? Oh, there aren't any around, they're extinct LMAO

Not in Brazil

roids for this?

The strength of a Neanderthal has been likened to that of a chimpanzee. Think at least three times that of a modern human.
Their skull and bones were also much thicker, so they could withstand blows that would easily knock out a modern human.

Attached: .jpg (835x1255, 158.08K)

Huh, you might be onto something...

Attached: 20220517_202638.jpg (1080x1069, 118.6K)

lanklets are next, mark my words, they fled to the snowlands but together with global warming we WILL finish them off

Oops wrong pic

Attached: skulls.png (1200x781, 394.66K)

Whats wrong with neanderthal teeths? Massive gaps between teeths.

How would you survive his onslaught?

Attached: e4380035-800px-wm.jpg (800x546, 122.73K)

Melanesians have higher denisovan DNA which I think is why their bones are much denser and play a lot of rugby

Attached: 1648160901337.jpg (388x469, 27.01K)

It's just one specimen.

They were like 2 heads shorter than this pic

Neanderthals were stronger and smarter than humans but had inferior reproduction rates.

Attached: a1985991742_10.jpg (1091x1200, 193.3K)

their women fucked the african (sapiens) bull

No we found tall skeletons too, but all in all we have very few of them.

Height is a disadvantage, since your center of mass is further away from your base, lowering stability significantly.

>Muh range
The angle compensates the arm length

Give me two guys with the same weight, my money is on the short guy.

Is this the Neanderthal Predation Theory thread?

>Give me two guys with the same weight, my money is on the short guy.
Of course since the short guy has more mass relative to his height
Usually its not like that though

I've read that all of the neanderthal DNA that modern humans have came from female neanderthal ancestors. It basically means that neanderthal males did not rape human females.
I guess humans were more agressive despite being more fragile.

Short height is a disadvantage because it implies that you can accumulate muscle mass less efficiently than a tall person would, if you measure it in "grams" or whatever. This also implies a lower ceiling for how much muscle you can accumulate total, though it's probably not a very realistic measure given the conditions they lived in
Taller person is much higher upkeep though, but as far as strength is concerned the taller the stronger should be the default view