Indians cant play any other sports other than crick-

>Football's progressing at a snail's pace. People outside of kerala Goa Bengal care about football now so maybe in the next ten years we'd be relevant.
you play cricket against a couple of other countries and still fail.

What makes you think that you will competitive in soccer, with pretty much every single country in the world having a soccer team.

>top field hockey athlete
>makes 40k a year and trains part time
>top ice hockey athlete
>multi millionaires
>top field hockey leagues
>404 not found
>top ice hockey leagues
>multiple professional leagues in multiple countries

also if you play field hockey as a guy its seen as extremely gay since its a sport for ladies

>What makes you think that you will competitive in soccer
Slow and steadily.

I've never seen a single pajeet playing a sport here. They all watch the NBA or some shit but don't actually play basketball

What's crazy is on the opposite end of the spectrum are blacks here, we have more Indian people than our entire black population combined yet black people here are like absurdly represented over a multitude of different sports here

Attached: 1655469464446 (1).png (450x934, 156.53K)

>Slow and steadily.
That would make sense, if everyone else was stagnant. But they aren't. They are constantly producing top talent.

cricket has 8 completive nations which is more than any other non-soccer sport
if they got soccer culture they could be goodat it through sheer population like Brazil because its such a general sport

lmao we don't even care about hockey here

gangrape

Attached: 1651790062178.jpg (1080x2280, 285.15K)

DO
NOT
REDEEM

since the 2000s,

6 different countries have won the soccer world cup. Not a single country has won the world cup more than one in this century.

To cricket's 3, australia won 3 cricket cups, england 1, and india 1.

So much for "competitiveness"

and those 3 are half the countries that play the game. The level of real competition in the sport is non-existent.

Attached: 1637434009175.png (640x642, 314.27K)

yeah obviously soccer is more competitive because Europe and south America have a lot of countries
but cricket has 8 nations that play it and could beat any of the other top 8. England, Australia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, West Indies, New Zealand, India, South Africa
while every other sport that isn't those 2 basically has one country that is dominant and a few more that orbit around it, like baseball, basketball, rugby league, AFL, NFL, Gaelic football, Ice hockey

I think your grossly overestimating how big of a sport cricket is and understanding just how big soccer is on a global level.

You think pajeets would dominate soccer because of population? Of the top 10 most populated countries on earth Brazil is the only one to have won a world cup. Every country on earth plays the sport and the top countries have Muti level tiers of clubs, tons of interest and decades of infrastructure. Forget the big name countries, even some of the top African countries and mid tier Europe and South American countries would absolutely murk India if they ever played.

Cricket is only played by Commonwealth countries and only a few of them at that. England won the last world cup and their interest in the sport is pretty minimal compared to soccer, just go on sky sports instagram page it's like 99% just taking about soccer and almost nothing about cricket, lots of other non south Asian countries like Pakistan , Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Honestly I would argue basketball is the world's most second popular sport. It's easily the #2 sport across Europe and it's the sport with the most revenue generating domestic leauges outside of soccer. it just doesn't have a strong international scene because the NBA is stronger than FIBA and the USA has been the most dominant nation by far for so long