As a result of the Jay Treaty (1794)...

As a result of the Jay Treaty (1794), "Native Indians born in Canada are therefore entitled to enter the United States for the purpose of employment, study, retirement, investing, and/or immigration" if they can prove that they have at least 50% blood quantum, and cannot be deported for any reason.
Unlike other legal immigrants, Canadian-born Native Americans residing in the US are entitled to public benefits and domestic tuition fees on the same basis as citizens.

Attached: 4bdede30-06f1-4f71-9047-c7db15051829.jpg (1613x975, 282.75K)

And ya wonder why we killed em all?

Why do winners need to give a shit about loosers? Canada is an anglosaxon country, all these benefits should be given to anglosaxon born canadians.

Shut up, brownie

Ok so shut up then I could snap your chud straw neck with a single gesture.

Groid

Canada is for canadians, remember that

>if they can prove that they have at least 50% blood quantum
Well im guessing that disqualifies at least half of them already.

> all these benefits should be given to anglosaxon born canadians.
the treaty did originally apply to all canadians (british subjects) and americans. The difference is that Canada doesn't recognize the treaty as part of canadian law, but the USA did accept it and they implemented the policy regarding native americans into the US immigration act.

And who is canadians?

>Why do winners need to give a shit about loosers?
Because we genocided them and now live in a SOVLLESS country

Dumb burgers

British settlers who moved to America during the 17th century, created the cities, culture and laws of today Canada. Anything else is foreigner trash.

Just end the job

I don't agree with the concept of winners vs. losers in this case. Europeans colonized this land and forced the natives to assimilate but there was no war where we defeated them. We made treaties with them and they became Crown subjects just like everyone else. So the only issue is whether the two sides are obeying/breaking the treaties, and what things are owed to each side based on the treaties, and based on everyone's rights as canadian citizens.

Says the loser who reeed for 700 years at the Maghrebi bull.
Then got macheted off his empire in 200 years.
Sad!

There are Blacks and mixed race folk if various types who have been in Canada from the start

> Dumb burgers
but it makes sense. After the American revolution, in order to make peace it was necessary to create a border between British and American territory. But some native lands were on both sides of this line. So they concluded that any natives could travel freely between either side. The only downside is that they smuggle tobacco and sometimes marijuana/narcotics/firearms. But it's hard to stop them from smuggling anyway they just use fast speedboats and the border patrol can't catch them all.

They learned your language, adopted your culture and accepted your king rule, they are the losers unable to protect their lands from newly arrivers. Canada should focus on the people that actually created the country, the anglosaxons, the people who risked their lifes on oceanic travel, that worked to build cities and farms to feed it, that built the roads, universities, hospitals. Non canadians are fine but shouldn't receive support.

You belong to a loser race beaten in a continent as massive as Eurasia in less than 50 years, your ruined raped mongrel people should have ended by 17th century but like cockroaches you clung to life.

> They learned your language, adopted your culture and accepted your king rule
so they should be rewarded for that, not punished. It's what the anglos wanted them to do, so I don't see why we should criticize them for doing what anglos said they should do.
> Canada should focus on the people that actually created the country, the anglosaxons, the people who risked their lifes on oceanic travel, that worked to build cities and farms to feed it, that built the roads, universities, hospitals. Non canadians are fine but shouldn't receive support.
The reality is that they control a lot of land which is strategically important to Canada because of resources like minerals/oil/gas/lumber and also for geopolitical reasons. Resources are a huge part of our economy so it's useful to keep them happy so we can continue to exploit these resources. Sometimes the government allows them to go too far with demands, some of that is leftie b.s. but some of it is just practical: we have to keep them happy to guarantee access to their resources.
You probably think we should just say fuck it and take all the resources by force. But there is a cost to breaking deals and treaties. You can break a treaty but you'll pay for it in reputation. The less trustworthy Canada is, the less leverage we have when negotiating: we will get a worse deal from future treaties, the same way as someone with bad credit pays a higher interest rate.

>Why do winners need to give a shit about loosers?
Ever heard of a consolation prize?
>Canada is an anglosaxon country, all these benefits should be given to anglosaxon born canadians.
Canadian a French country, then a scots country, then a sikh country, then a Chinese country, then an anglo saxon country.

you guys really like to overrepresent how many chinese and indians are in the country. There are more people of german origin than both of them combined.

Attached: 09389108391084.png (371x736, 25.58K)

Reading these stats I fail to see how this supports your argument.

Here's another way of looking at it. how are we an asian or sikh country according to these stats?

Attached: 01934810849141.png (1475x817, 83.8K)

I have more amerindian blood than him.
I hate white people when they wanna pass like amerindians.

here's the USA for comparison

Attached: 01934810849142.png (1166x690, 80.79K)