Why do they sill use chinese characters?
Why do they sill use chinese characters?
James Watson
Other urls found in this thread:
gpseducation.oecd.org
news.v.daum.net
twitter.com
Andrew Rogers
I don't know why do we?
Henry Mitchell
like hello kitty?
Jack Mitchell
we use latin alphabet too
Parker Martinez
No one denies that Chinese characters are objectively difficult characters. It takes fucking years to read and write Chinese characters perfectly. Is this normal? Studying other things is much more productive than learning Chinese characters.
Andrew Wilson
>It takes fucking years to read and write Chinese characters perfectly.
not true
>Is this normal?
depends on the learner
Jaxson King
Do you know Chinese characters better than me? How many Chinese characters do you know and say like this? just shut up noob pinoy monkey
Benjamin Nelson
World number 2 GDP- China
Word number 3 GDP- Japan
Both use Chinese characters
Korean is too low iq to use Chinese characters
Benjamin Roberts
Chinese characters have nothing to do with intelligence. Simply memorizing is something even monkeys do.
Ethan Hughes
I know Korean who can't even write their surname lmfao
Pathetic "nation"
Brandon Clark
Can I do this test without knowing Korean?
Jaxon Russell
Learn Korean is definitely NOT more productive than learn Chinese , Korean is 10/10 trash .
Zachary Torres
It's inefficient. If you only know Hangul, you won't have any problems living in Korea. Why do Koreans need to know Chinese characters? And Chinese characters should be completely abolishedin Korea. Fuxking disgusting China and Chinese characters
Hunter Sanchez
uh... Chinese hieroglyphs bros?
Owen Howard
>whole top 5 and 6 of the top 7 are tax havens
Feels bad man.
Lincoln Ward
You all use chinese characters or something shit like this, retard
Juan Brown
/東亞/
日本
臺灣
大韓民國
香港
支那
Christian Turner
Hangul supermacy is ultra Koreans nationalisim.
Hangul has critical homonym problems. However korean does not have any real solutions of homonym problems by Hangul system alone. What korean can do is ONLY GUESS the meaning by each of the sentence.
So even now korean news perpar and academic essay is puting chinese character or English words next to Hangul words when they explain difficult vocabulary.
>Since 70% of Korean vocabulary is based on deogramic kanji vocabulary , using hangul alone is unnatural.(Korean got rid of Chinese characters from Korean language "only since after ww2" as the nationalisim") and it is causing full of homonyms problemsin Korean language.
This is hardly say perfect language as the ultra nationalisit Korean says
For example , Korean homonym problem cause of the big problems at 2010.
that has been confirmed Korean High Speed Rail KTX sleepers were all defective prodacts and have to replaced it.
It is the result of mistaking「방수」which 防水(Waterproof)and 放水(water dischargeing )are the same homonym in korea.
The cause of the crack of the Korean High Speed Rail KTX sleepers coused by the specification document was misunderstood by the korean homonymous words "water dischargeing
" and " waterproof "is the same homonym 「방수」in Korean.
So that Absorbent sponge material was used for the material of the plug (hook bolt) which the manufacturer ordered from the subcontractor.
There is a lot of those problems occurring by the homonyms problems of hangul.
Even those easy words about math is like this so many homonyms
素数(Prime number) 小数(Decimal) 少数(Small number) all of them are only one word 소수 and can not distinguish them by Hangul.
Japanese spoken vocabulary and writing vocabulary is different and japanese are using kanji to distinguish them.
Korean has no any solution except guessing the meaning from the contexts.
Thomas Miller
based
do you have a word like 'based' (meaning 1.) in Chinese?
Zachary Murphy
Why do you?
Tyler White
Why not?
You can use the the hieroglyphs or cyrillic as well. Cyrillic would be a better fit most probably.
Leo Torres
Too bad bro
In reality, functional literacy of japanese language is highest in the world
Why we have to change it since its highest already
and on the other hand korean language of functional literacy is lower than average
It means scientifically already proven japanese language is much better than hangul at least
gpseducation.oecd.org
news.v.daum.net
Hangul supermacy is stupid Koreans nationalisim.
Brody Moore
>Muh efficiency
You sound like a cultureless African tier country
Which makes sense because the Yangban were the true keepers of Korea culture. Pleb Koreans were Africa tier. Korean culture died with the reforms of the Korean empire. Modern Korean just larp like Chinese Hanfu larpers. Look at those "palace guards" with fake beards. Korea doesn't even have a king! Fake country fake culture and fake plastic face
Adam James
The real culture of Korea is Hangeul, not Chinese characters. You should wake up too, but I understand what you don't understand because you are very conservative and afraid of change.
Nathan King
So Korea didn't exist before 15th century! Lmfao
Xavier Gray
>>Since 70% of Korean vocabulary is based on deogramic kanji vocabulary , using hangul alone is unnatural.(Korean got rid of Chinese characters from Korean language "only since after ww2" as the nationalisim") and it is causing full of homonyms problemsin Korean language.
> (Korean got rid of Chinese characters from Korean language "only since after ww2" as the nationalisim")
> Hangul has critical homonym problems. However korean does not have any real solutions of homonym problems by Hangul system alone. What korean can do is ONLY GUESS the meaning by each of the sentence.
> korean language of functional literacy is lower than average
gpseducation.oecd.org
news.v.daum.net
Understand? If you do bot undersand this meaning then you are hopelessly functional illiteracy idiot.