What makes Hindu so weak at resisting another religion? They got almost completely replaced by Islam and Buddhism

In Hinduism being a householder and taking care of your family properly or you can be an aghori, living naked, disgusting and being anti social both are considered valid paths to achieve the highest goal.

In Islam everything is written extremely clearly and there can be no other philosophical interpretations. The only way to change is disagreement.

I meant to say
*Both are considered valid
householder or freak

Retard.
India was all Buddhist before Hinduism took over

islam proscribes the death penalty for apostasy. so the most extreme people on one side can claim the other side's beliefs are so wrong theyre apostates, justifying war and even random homicide against them

Absolutely, the only real difference is that Buddhists believe in No-Self (Anatman) while Hindus believe in an eternal Self (Atman). Buddha himself was a Hindu prince and Hindus sometimes worship him as an Avatar of Lord Vishnu. However, in the 20th century Ambedkarites tried to push forward Buddhism as an anti-Hindu pan-Dalit religion. Actual Buddhists and Hindus get a long

>Islam and Buddhism
both are proselytising religion.. one by violence and state patronage and the other by an army of monks.

In Hinduism there are many different paths one can take to reach enlightenment. You're encouraged to experiment and figure out what works for you. In Islam there is only one path. If you have a problem with it or question it everyone hates you

>islam proscribes the death penalty for apostasy
Stop believe this bs

It is.

Attached: images (26).jpg (656x468, 36.49K)

That's not even half of Muslim population combined
>Also Malaysia
Do they really?

Hindus used to beat the shit out of Buddhists in ancient times

Not correct
Buddhists dont mind laypeople being essentially hindu but philosophically buddhism is the polar opposite of hinduism

Even Shiva followers and Vishnu followers were killing each other looon looong time ago.

you CAN leave Hinduism and Buddhism
but you can't leave islam even in the so called modern world there are several countries where leaving islam Or converting other religions results in death or imprisonment legally
for example if a Buddhist wants to follow Hinduism he can meanwhile even if you leave one sect of islam to the other it's going to be problematic

>tp
>tf
LOL

Both incorrect.
There was conflict, the same as between different sects, but it was rarely ever violent, and was confined to debates.

>inb4 pushyamitra Sunga
PROVEN to be deliberately misquoted. No 'buddhist genocide' took place. He only ordered to kill two monks who were conspiring with the enemy kingdom, as described in the Buddhist Sutra.

both were political not ideological or theologically motivated
t

>Not correct
It is.
Charvaka athiesm is Hinduism too.
Hinduism doesnt necessarily mean Vedic-following.

To think there are people who go on and lie on the internet

Is wearing dreadlocks and listening to reggae music hindu as well?
What about islam is that also hindu?
And hunting african game animals is also hindu?

>oy vey 6 quadrillion buddhus were killed
if not for hindus ghori, khilji and the rest of the muslims would have finished off buddhists forever in the subcontinent

Buddhism and Hindu share the deities.
There is a little shrine of Sarasvati in my backyard.

>you can't leave islam
Bullshit
Communists in albania destroyed thousands of mosques

Attached: 9D67485D-E264-4CDB-A79F-640D0EADE5D4.jpg (1125x1048, 156.26K)

>i am being pedantic on purpose

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mihirakula

Lol

I'm not being pedantic. I want to understand what your definition of hindu is

Its not clear.

Hinduism is all the philosophies that originated in the Indian subcontinent.

Honestly Islam is a cancerous religion, only comparable to Medieval Catholicism.

Mihrakula was a Scythian hun, not 'hindu', who killed buddhists because buddhists didnt reply to his invitation to preach Buddhism.

He literally patronised Shaivism
It says right there