Kinda wild how muslim persians, muslim turks, then christian anglo-saxons all tried to civilize india...

Kinda wild how muslim persians, muslim turks, then christian anglo-saxons all tried to civilize india, and every single one of the failed. Wild.

Attached: taj-mahal-visitor-limits.jpg (850x785, 96.88K)

>civilize india
we civilized all of them

on a serious note, ancient india was much more civilized than any of those invaders, i wish we could return to that glory

SAARS are too strong to redeem.

india unironically has more literature than English.

Anglos are the most powerful people

To be fair, every single person who invaded India basically became Indian. All realized that winning the religious war was probably too hard since India has always been a place of multiple religions since the dawn of time.

Also what do you mean by "civilized"? India is kinda known for being one of the most technologically and politically advanced places of the ancient, classical, and medieval world. Every educated European until ww2 studies the greatness of India among other classical civilizations. Without Indians being so keen on writing and whatnot, we wouldn't even know what Aryans are

>t. Vishwanath Singh
India has written nothing of value.
Muslims had to teach India how to write their history down after Anglos had written Beowulf because even Indians knew their existence was irrelevant

Can we at least acknowledge that Anglos did the best job?

>India has written nothing of value.
lol

>Muslims had to teach India how to write their history down
oh like this? with cute little pictures? kek

Attached: blacked by dravidian.jpg (616x990, 358.67K)

Attached: india.webm (960x540, 2.95M)

some systems helped improve india and some other tools that are of use to them but india has a ton of undeveloped people just like africa.

>muslim
>civilizing anyone
lol, lmao even

Attached: 1.webm (576x1024, 2.72M)

Indians used to br know for kama sutra now they are known for desperation. I think they only made things worse from a sex perspective

I'd agree, but it's not saying much. The strategy of the EIC was to keep India as a whole poor and not industrialized, which definitely fucked India over for while after independence

>India has written nothing of value.
Kelileh VA Demneh or Kalilah was Damna says otherwise.
>It's written in Old Farsi

You're actually not wrong. EIC successfully deindustrialised the entire region, turned them into a raw exporter and a net importer of cheap British goods. No one damaged the region as much as the anglos.

The fact that the Indians salvaged the anglo instruments of oppression and turned them into institutions to run their country which has continued to exist 75 years running has more to do with the resilience the region has already exhibited prior to all this.

we could if we could kick the 72's out

holy moly you need to cope

I'd prefer bri'ish any time of the day over the muzzies but mideast muzzies had a good culture. It just got degraded by the time it came here.

dravidians are muzzies ? ?

indians are pathetic people with fragile ego

Ṛg Veda (Skt., ‘knowledge in verse’). The oldest of the Veda collections of hymns (c.13th cent. BCE)

Attached: rg veda.jpg (1024x768, 106.95K)

Hello saar, pleesed to remember Pakiistan turkey best friend ok.

>Muslims had to teach India how to write their history down after Anglos had written Beowulf because even Indians knew their existence was irrelevant

>the manuscript, which was produced between 975 and 1025.
LOL
Quick google search, Indians were writing all sorts of shit down since like 900 BCE. Not even counting the likelihood of Indus Valley Civilization proto-writing, Iron age India was a hotbed for literature and poetry.

> Pāṇini was a Sanskrit philologist, grammarian, and revered scholar in ancient India
>Pāṇini's analysis of noun compounds still forms the basis of modern linguistic theories of compounding in Indian languages. Pāṇini's comprehensive and scientific theory of grammar is conventionally taken to mark the start of Classical Sanskrit. His systematic treatise inspired and made Sanskrit the preeminent Indian language of learning and literature for two millennia.
>Pāṇini's theory of morphological analysis was more advanced than any equivalent Western theory before the 20th century. His treatise is generative and descriptive, uses metalanguage and meta-rules, and has been compared to the Turing machine wherein the logical structure of any computing device has been reduced to its essentials using an idealized mathematical model.
>Pāṇini's work became known in 19th-century Europe, where it influenced modern linguistics initially through Franz Bopp, who mainly looked at Pāṇini. Subsequently, a wider body of work influenced Sanskrit scholars such as Ferdinand de Saussure, Leonard Bloomfield, and Roman Jakobson. Frits Staal (1930–2012) discussed the impact of Indian ideas on language in Europe. After outlining the various aspects of the contact, Staal notes that the idea of formal rules in language – proposed by Ferdinand de Saussure in 1894 and developed by Noam Chomsky in 1957 – has origins in the European exposure to the formal rules of Pāṇinian grammar.

why do you hate indians? religion? personal experiences? Any Forums memes?

>tf
>tp

Attached: DE7689E4-0679-49EE-8A40-A1671F5D3837.jpg (2544x4000, 381.85K)

I can read this one as well.

Attached: 1655152640048.png (899x720, 173.02K)

Is Old Farsi very similar to normal Farsi? For example Hindi and Prakrit are pretty different. As are English and Old English.

Nice projection, roach