African slaves were considered expensive, going for around 50 Sterling...

>African slaves were considered expensive, going for around 50 Sterling, whereas their Irish counterparts were viewed as cheap, selling at less than 5 Sterling. why did a black slave cost more than a Irish one?

Attached: 1655064959716.png (1286x1198, 373.68K)

>why did a black slave cost more than a Irish one?
irish are small, weak, and unable to sexually satisfy the wives of slave masters.

is any of this true or made up

the transport costs and the fact that they were seen as being more efficient (stronger/durable)

It was a thing.
They also thought Irish were more upity, and more likely to start a revolt. Which to be fair they were.

you could own a black slave for life, Irish or other psuedo-white "slaves" were indentured servants who had to serve you for only a certain period of time and then were set free. Most of the time Irish servants just left and no one could really get them back since they could blend in with a crowd

Man I wish I was in Belize

we needed BBC

Weird. I remember reading that back in the American slavery days slave masters would mix irish girls and african slaves to produce light-skinned slavelings since those fetched higher prices at slave markets

Based history knower.

The biggest reason why Europeans decided on importing africans and not other Europeans (although Europeans were imported for a while) is because Africans were objectively better than the Irish in every way, according to the plantation owners. In the early 1700's Europeans started re doing all of the race hierarchy stuff and put blacks at the bottom because there way no other way to justify African slavery. Before this time, Europeans had no concept of "black and white" as racial groups and didn't rank one as higher than the other. OPs image is proof, Irish were seen as an inferior "race" compared to West Africans (known as Sudanese at the time)

>you could own a black slave for life, Irish or other psuedo-white "slaves" were indentured servants who had to serve you for only a certain period of time
Blacks were mostly indentured servants and not slaves at the beginning. So your argument doesn't hold up at all

Attached: blacks in america.png (1828x1400, 402.7K)

Man we really were autistic about race

>Blacks were mostly indentured servants and not slaves at the beginning.
Dog the Caribbean exists

>we cannot survive without africans
lmao what a load of bullshit

the biggest chuds are the ones who can't get past the first stage of grief upon seeing factual information

Its real Barbados had A slave rebel lead by a Irish men hahaha

Why? All British men do in Belize is have sex and wonder into the jungle

True, but I'm mostly talking about the US. Also the irish slave trade happened before the African one really took off. Again, its because the irish were just seen as inferior to everyone else. Africans were seen as more expensive laborers who knew way more about farming and being artisans, and therefore were of higher quality.


>From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade.
>During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia.
>As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.
> African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African

Wtf its true

>The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.”
>In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.
LOL

We were too smart to work like the niggers. And the dirty protestant cunts in America knew we would steal their wives and daughters so they charged less for us. We are the greatest nation in the world and God loves us. Anyone who disagrees with me is gay and wrong

>read the historical facts in this thread
>read your post
>see the flag
I will never ever take an Irish flag seriously going forward hahahahahaha fucking slaves

>in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.
holy shit that is specific

That's not cool, slavery as an institution is an abhorrent sin and a terrible time in human history.

Attached: 1648006720694.png (660x589, 240.16K)

Wrong.blacks and Irish worked on the same farm in Jamaica, Barbados and bvi. So yeah cope haha

Irish is more likely to escape because he can easily blend in the population and live as a free man. Africans couldn't do this so the African basically had a longer warranty.

Think of it like buying a washing machine. The African machine is likely to work for decades with no problems. The Irish machine is likely to break in one year. Would you pay more for the African or the Irish machine?

I just can't take those leprechauns seriously anymore. First, I find out their entire economy floats on the backs of American corporations like Apple who use the country as a tax haven. So most of the GNI is made up, fantom if you will. Second, I find out that irish were seen as lower than blacks for centuries. This changed when WASPs needed to start expanding the definition of white to include non WASPs and Southern/Eastern Europeans.
So whenever I see an irish fag talking about "niggress women are so ugly" etc I cant help but smile to myself. Especially since Irish flags are strangely very very racist compared to other europeans

its not true

grim

Attached: Zrzut ekranu z 2022-06-12 23-22-50.png (732x438, 106.24K)

>having any redeeming value other than being a literal farm animal is somehow bad
Typical porn-addict worm-brained mutt.

Jesus Christ dude the english really did a number on them.

>Invade your neighbors and murder the men for being catholic
>Kidnap their wives and daughters, ships them to carribbean
>Literally turns them into livestock

Nazis really were not that bad in comparison.

OPs entire post basically says that Africans had a lot more value than Irish, who were seen as dead weight. The women, though, had some use as cocksleeves for black studs as shown here

Fpbp

Why are there so many killings on Belize city
What's a nice city to go to

Attached: belize-city-crime.png (429x461, 427.32K)