Why was subsaharan Africa incapable of creating any civilization or culture of great value?

Why are you so powerful?

Giganiggagenetics, son.

Based yakub

Nubia didn't progress past anicent times, it was very primitive compared with Eurasian societies. And also Bantus expanded into the actual useful land in Africa while most of East Africa is arid desert.
>it's the natural progression of human societies is some marxshit.
But it is. Even among primitive socities like those or Africans and Amerindians, there was some advancement, albeit very slow, compared to Eurasians. Mesoamericans independently advanced from hunter-gatherers to farmers.
>Why would pastoralists-hunters need giant walled cities and massive farms in ancient times?
Farming can support much larger populations than hunting, giant-walled cities are a consequence of large, dense populations. In every region of the world farming societies outcompete hunter-gatherers, such that the latter must adopted farming or risk being dominated by the former. That's a very clear progression im human history.

Why is this site so obsessed with this building

That's a very cool building

No written culture, hence no organized transmission of knowledge
Pagan hodgepodge instead of Christian values
Average IQ lagged behind other regions

La ilaha illAllah
He has revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺ the Book in truth, confirming what came before it, as He revealed the Torah and the Gospel

Quran.com

If all black people embrace Islam (Highly likely) it is over for the whyboi and the ricecel

Why is every pic of civilization in Sub-Saharan Africa just an illustration?

Blacks with most incel religion in the world is truly most odd combination ngl

Attached: main-qimg-25549dd3b66958a744d8d36724e59680-lq.jpg (244x308, 24.97K)

But why do you need a larger population in the first place? Or walled cities? Those needs come from having hostile neighbors that regularly raid and steal your stuff.
So in that situation: you need larger population because you need more soldiers for the army. But then you need more food to feed the soldiers and the new babies, so you make bigger farms. But then by making your city bigger, you become a bigger target, so you need to build a walled area that is easily defensible.
It's true that in some cases farming societies outcompete hunter-gatherers, but what if everyone around you is also hunters and pastoralists? There's no competition from farmers so you never need to build a giant city with walls. Plus it would be a waste of resources because you need to move around often.

And there's also an exception to this: the warrior-pastoralists like the Maasai and the European Steppe nomads conquered the farmers and become the government. That's why the Indo-European language family is so big.

Low IQ

malaria, tsetse fly giving african sleeping sickness (100% mortality rate) making agriculture really fucking annoying because all your livestock dies but "africans" (idiotic term because they are more genetically diverse than all other "races") still pulled it off in west africa
garbage geography and weather doesn't help either, humans evolved in africa and once they left the super competitive ecosystem of africa they took over the world

Attached: Overlap-of-the-distribution-of-tsetse-flies-and-freshwater-species-richness-The-latter.jpg (850x1267, 199.69K)

Quran.com/4/19

Nubian pyramids still exist but they got plundered in colonial era by treasure hunters & are in advance stage of disrepair so I posted the painting

Attached: images (47).jpg (678x452, 53.65K)

Like China (though obviously not to the same degree) West Africa was stable and fairly prosperous until the 1600s.

Some of the hallmarks of civilization include:
>Writing and complex record keeping
didn't really happen in Africa because of the limited avenues for trade. Some of the earliest writing man has ever produced has been receipts and bills of trade. It's worth noting that the only logographical proto-script Africa ever produced, Nsibidi, originated among the Igboid tribes at the Niger delta, where trade would have been the strongest.

>Large, urban population centers
Again, similar reason to the first. Huge areas (Bantus only JUST finished colonizing all of Africa by the time Europeans arrived), lack of trade opportunities, etc.

>Rigid social classes
Most agrarian African societies were slave societies, but the distinction between slave and freeman were often vague and noncommittal. This one doesn't have a clear explanation that I can think of.

Lets not even talk about Sudan which is basically Egypt.. Ethiopia and Somalia had writing 2000-3000 years before Germanics, They also had complex trading cities and law. Reminder that most Germans were spear chuckers before contact with Rome. You're not any better than subsaharan Africa, stupid snownigger.

The most based post by an Argentinian I've read in a long time

Ayo hol up
So u be
So u be sayin
U be sayin we wuz William Chuckspear n shiet