So the clear implication is that juror 8 killed the guy and he feels guilty about the kid being blamed so he joined the...

So the clear implication is that juror 8 killed the guy and he feels guilty about the kid being blamed so he joined the jury to stop him getting convicted right?

Attached: A823B719-F27F-4BF7-94D1-7F2CBE20EAAE.jpg (1577x1097, 397.08K)

the kid did it and 8 is a typical leftist is all. it's spike lee before spike lee was born basically

Let's be honest, the circumstantial evidence was OVERWHELMING.

I'm not saying you should vote to convict on that basis, but deep down we all know the swarthy fella did it.

this

realistically the definitely broke the jury instructions with the experiments. Idk if it could force a mistrial since they rendered a verdict of innocent instead of not guilty. This is basically a how not to in terms of being a juror, kid just had incompetent lawyers.

If he's black he's innocent. Thats my motto.

No, the not-subtle-at-all implication is that the kid didn't get a fair trial which makes the entire process stupid.
It doesn't matter whether or not he did it, if he doesn't get a fair trial then the entire system is broken and he should be acquitted on principal. Same reason OJ was acquitted more or less

>brought in outside evidence
>experiments
>did research outside on their own time
They broke a lot of fucking rules. It would immediately get thrown out, and a retrial granted at best.

>so he joined the jury to stop him getting convicted

you don't know how juries work, do you, retard

wasn't there an article or redditpost about how ludicrous Henry Fonda's threshold for evidence is in this?

You don't need a reddit post to see the obvious. You can't believe anything under the juror's pilpul.

That's literally how Richard Nixon avoided impeachment and is a well-known flaw of the us criminal justice system

reddit: the movie

>black people aren't criminals because....they just aren't ok!!!

...what

gaslighting: the movie

He killed the guy who was supposed to be on the jury and stole his identity.

Richard Nixon produced a flashlight they used in watergate during the trial, which was enough to show that someone else could have done it.

Nixon was on the equivalent of the jury so he voted against impeachment and convinced the others to join him

No he wasn't.

Not guilty verdicts cant be retried. So unless they caught them breaking the rules during deliberation and granted a mistrial (would most likely happen irl), the case can't be retried