Well?

Well?

Attached: h.265-vs-h.264.jpg (1280x720, 111.12K)

people that use commas as radix points aren't human

well

Attached: well.jpg (900x1200, 714.42K)

Gonna have to agree with the other user, that comma usage is strange.

wow. thanks for using different frames so that we aren't able to spot any noticeable differences

i'm convinced H265 is just a blurrier H264. it's a good tradeoff for the filesize (which is a more significant reduction than OP's piece of shit image that's obviously all the same bitrate) and good for movies that aren't anything special like comedies

dunno what this shit is but if it aint yify it aint worth shit lmfao

A:7.5
V:8
for a camrip

dey all rook same

thank you

>using different segments of the same image instead of the same segment for comparison
trash

They're German.

The majority of the filesize is the audio.
128kbps audio x 120 minute movie x 60 sec/min = 921.6MB.
The 720p video is a 100kb jpg every 20 frames, 24 frames per second = 14.4MB.
A 1gig rip is like 90% audio on average.

Get your retarded eyes checked.

The brain is much more forgiving of video compression artifacts than audio artifacts.

almost always 48kHz too

shouldn't it be flat?

x265 4me

x265 is a bust, the extra overhead in processing just to get an image almost exactly the same as x264 isn't worth the slight reduction in file size.

No way I'm downloading 4k x264

H265 is by far the best. People here don't realize you can either go for H264 quality with around 70% the file size.

Or go the similar filesize as H264 but with about 50% better picture quality.

H265 should ALWAYS be used by default but with a focus on better picture quality while having the same size as H264 files.

They all get mogged by AV1.