With a $1.3m budget, will Chris Stuckmann's directorial debut SHELBY OAKS be kino?

With a $1.3m budget, will Chris Stuckmann's directorial debut SHELBY OAKS be kino?

Attached: PP_s1_3_11_22_v1.png (1040x576, 734.47K)

I dont care, but girl on right is qt

Where is is track record of honing his craft?

>A woman's desperate search for her long-lost sister falls into obsession upon realizing that the imaginary demon from their childhood may have been real
>horror/thriller
I'm gonna say right now he should commit to it being a horror, but he'll want it to be a suave thriller and end up just making it boring

No amount of budget can help the fact that Stuckmann, like most of us, is a just viewer of movies. Unlike most of us though, he's convinced himself that his love of film can somehow be transferred into actual talent. If he had demonstrated directorial talent in the past, I'd be interested in seeing what he can do, but this is the dope who made a few shitty student films and an embarrassing BvS fan script.

This movie will fucking suck and we'll all get to laugh at it when it's out, so at least it'll have value in that sense.

for example: what kind of a name for a film is "Shelby Oaks"

It going to be a pretentious pile of shit and I'll be sitting with the RLM bros laughing my ass off.

What kind of a film can you make with a 1.3m budget?
Blair Witch Project had a $500k budget and it was literally just handycam footage of people walking around in the woods.

Attached: 1636004577783.png (379x1182, 289.78K)

And unlike most of us he has over a million dollars to make it work.

I mean, he can use the money to hire a good director of photography and a screenwriter to compensate for his lack of film-making knowledge.

wtf why did adam scott change his name and turn into a faggot

Jealous bruv?

don't worry he'll fall on his face and make some piece of shit like all movie 'critics' turned directors do. And then he'll say it was intentional satire of the oversaturated genre.

I'd honestly be interested to see what normal viewers of movies can do behind the camera

>With a $1.3m budget, will Chris Stuckmann's directorial debut SHELBY OAKS be kino?

No

Halloween had a famously low budget of 325,000 USD. El Mariachi cost 7000 dollars. It's definitely possible to make a proper, even profitable movie with a shoestring budget.
> love of film can somehow be transferred into actual talent
How do you think people got started? Listen to Werner Herzog. You scrape together what you can, you convince people you need to convince and you make it happen. The biggest barrier to success is never trying in the first place.

All that said Stuckman will fail because he is a cuck with shitty opinions and tastes.

Attached: 1645658084614.jpg (1902x937, 324.32K)

It depends on the script to be honest. El Mariachi and Tangerine had low budget and those are good enjoyable films

It's going to be neither kino or cringe kino. Just safe, boring and mediocre

Imagine the Netflix true crime doco when he steals everyone's money

Expanded list:

Reservoir Dogs: 1.2M
American Graffiti: 700K
Duel: 450K
Monty Python and the Holy Grail: 400K
Evil Dead: 375K
Aguirre, the Wrath of God: 370K
Cube: 350K
Halloween: 325K
Blair Witch Project: 300K
Night of the Living Dead: 114K
Tangerine: 100K
Paranormal Activity: 15K
Primer: 7000
El Mariachi: 7000

All profitable, some very good.

Oh wait I've got more:

Vanishing Point: 1.5M
The Raid: 1.1M
Rocky: 1.1M
Badlands: 300K
Pi: 135K

if it ends up bad, will it get a spotlight on Best of the Worst?

He can pretty much make transformers but he's making a creepypasta