Why would they let such an objectively unskilled amateur participate in the gallery showing?

Why would they let such an objectively unskilled amateur participate in the gallery showing?

Attached: wcau11x303131.jpg (1082x610, 62.17K)

to differentiate from the British version by making Michael redeemable

explain why you think she's objectively unskilled

They (correctly) assumed she had Down's Syndrome

It’s just a community gallery, for the citizens, not so much a really tightly curated display of art

I can recall another famous artist the critics said was unskilled who went on to do big things.

So they wanted to show her as she's Hitler?

they cut out a story line where Pam is scorned by NYU's art program and joins the German army

It was a metaphor for Hitler

Her pictures are totally fine but the thrill seeking elitists on here will tell you they are just being murdered whenever someone makes a suitable normal thing

The mug painting is grade school art class tier.

No it’s not, and it’s still nice

Hitler?

it's Scranton

Within 35 seconds. Impressive.

No understanding of negative space
Beyond amateur brush work
Awful colour theory
Pointless unimaginative subject matter
Literally 13 year old art-has-been-my-life-since-last-week level of work, very very poor.

wrong
and that's just one of them

Am I being trolled?

ok so that's your subjective explanation, now explain why it's objectively unskilled.

There are two suns

It's motel art.

There is objectively very little skill involved

> No understanding of negative space
Nonsense. Everything in the pictures has exactly the volume of the subjects. You’re reaching
>Beyond amateur brush work
She’s not perfect but she captures a lot of textures accurately, the vase is particularly nice
>Awful colour theory
They’re just colored like the subject, and have pastel coloring. Nothing wrong with that
>Pointless unimaginative subject matter
These are just normal things painted nicely. Not only does it reflect her desires, but a lot of people’s basic appreciation for normal things. Your subjective distaste and boredom for the things you see in your life isn’t binding. It’s just you groaning at a coffee cup not being a dragon or something.
>Literally 13 year old art-has-been-my-life-since-last-week level of work, very very poor
Nah

this. they are just happy if a few people show up

Sure there is. And art isn’t about the skill of the artist. You’re welcome to your high falutin ideas of fine art, but a nice picture of a normal thing is perfectly suitable

do something better in MS paint right now artfag

there is quite a bit of skill involved actually

*ahem*
the creation of and appreciation of art is entirely subjective

don't @ me