WE'RE GONNUH KILL NAAHHTSIES

stopped watching Tarantino when every one of his flicks became the same exploitation shit about revenge instead of actually telling a story, with Kill Bill being the last time he even bothered having real characters in a movie

Kill Bill had real characters?

go outside

Attached: goofy reading anon's post.jpg (251x238, 17.77K)

Shalom

Is a film that explains to us how Hollywood movies about Nazis are pure lies.

Tarantino does three things in this movie:
It exposes the Jews as villains.
Confesses his love for the Germans and German Nazi cinema.
He explains to us how the cinema has been used as sensational propaganda by the Allies and the Jews ever since.

Think about it. The whole movie revolves around constant exaggeration, the Basterds are presented in an extremely satirical way but in reality they are showing what they are, a bunch of sadistic Jews. They team up with Hugo Stiglitz, an older sadist. They are clearly not a group of heroes.

Although there are Nazis who are presented as bad, like Landa or Zoller, they do not stop having a different appeal from the Basterds who are very tense.

Hitler is presented as a caricature like the one Hollywood has been doing ever since. He is shorter than Goebbels, yells and has a cartoonish laugh.

The Officer who dies at the hands of the Jewish Bear maintains his courage, like a Hellenic hero, until the end. That's the version of the NS that Tarantino wanted to show, that scene is powerful.

There are many examples in the film, but it is very clear in the first scene, the conversation between Landa and LaPadite.

You might be overthinking it. I think that what the movie does is it shows nobody as good guys, but relatively speaking it still makes the Basterds seem more righteous than the Nazis because the Basterds' violence is impulsive and spur-of-the-moment compared to Landa's drawn-out sadism.

>muh nazies
>please show your support to Israel
why are burgers like that?

Overthinking is never a lack in a Tarantino movie, that guy has a thing for complexity in his stories, like the homosexual relation between Orange and White in Reservoir Dogs (Thing that actually gives more sense the fact that Keitel defends so much a guy he doesn't know); The Suitcase that till this day we don't know what it holds, etc.

I think Tarantino just wants to make trashy violent films and picks whatever subject matter that will allow him to make them and have scolds cheer him for it i.e anti-nazi, women, slavery.

>complexity
This has to be bait. Nobody is this fucking dumb.

It was originally supposed to be Cheka liquidating kulaks, but that was too on the nose

If there is no complexity then tell me what was in that suitcase.

Every scene with the eponymous Basterds is a detriment to this movie, on my opinion. very forgettable performances

Brainlets insist that there's an intentional irony in the Basterds being portrayed as bloodthirsty barbarians while the Germans are noble sophisticates. However, the movie always treats the Nazis as the inarguable villains and there's no deeper message to be gleaned from this interpretation. I have to assume that Tarantino was just too devoted to revenge fantasy to ever see the irony. Also Brad Pitt was terrible, his thick California accent made his attempt to sound Kentuckian ridiculous. Californians have by far the most obnoxious American accent.

Even though it's verboten on Any Forums to like this movie, I enjoy it a lot. The dialogue scenes were memorable, Waltz's performance was amazing, and making some of the Germans sympathetic was an interesting take whether it was intentional or not.

It just represents something valuable, you were literally filtered by Quentin Tarantino, the break dancing samurai guy.