Why do you guys shit on MCU CGI but no other movies?

why do you guys shit on MCU CGI but no other movies?

Attached: 0k8zb5thvfd71.jpg (900x900, 101.39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=sLxxbfsj8IM
youtu.be/sLxxbfsj8IM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Blade Runner 2 sucked and Villanova is the new Nolan

MCU CGI's an empty room behind a character.
that's a fucking futuristic city.

I'm going to go ahead and say it:
BR2049 blew my mind with the CGI and I think it's how CGI should be used

ryan gosling cannot act

Damn... why didn't they build an entire cyberpunk las vegas mega city?

At least they tried and had an actual site

villeneuve has boring production designs and cover everything in smoke and fog

Attached: dunc.jpg (261x193, 3.04K)

this
>cgi a completely normal weapon
>cgi a normal road in a scene without much action
>cgi a normal room with normal people without any action happening
>cgi every single cape costume, even the more plain ones
it's almost a video game

>physical set for areas in foreground
>blurry sci-fi background is CGI

literally exactly what CGI should be used for.

First post best post

how did 1982 blade runner make a believable city then? no shitty CGI and better production design

Attached: br4.png (1279x736, 547.83K)

>these retards get paid millions for some wagie programmers to make the scene for them

not that user, and you're right about original BR being miles better, but thinking 2049 is comparable with MCU and calling its CGI shitty is just pure stupidity or plain trolling

Villeneuvebros be like "this is true cinema"

Attached: BladeRunner2049_JohnNelson_ITW_08A.jpg (1400x584, 65.03K)

this is reasonable because there's at least an attempt made to create the rest of the scene practically

>actual car
>actual dirt
>actual clothes
Aka not just running around in a big green box.

did you expect them to create a dusty futuristic city for trhe shot?

Instead of replying, hang yourself

You are comparing a shot of a street to a shot of an entire city. The original Blade Runner had really good miniatures made to represent the city, but that meant that they were extremely limited in how they could composite both the actors and the giant city in one frame.

>Crane holding up a greenscreen in the same looking environment
>Opposed to an entire fucking room composed of green screen walls and guys in green screen tights

How do they make anything useful out of that badly lid green screen? I thought the surface had to be somewhat flawless for a good key.

That is literally a miniature though.

youtube.com/watch?v=sLxxbfsj8IM

bandwagon follower.
also nolan makes good films

youtu.be/sLxxbfsj8IM

Marvel CGI is terrible and done by Indians in sweatshop conditions and entire movies are shot on green screen. I don’t mind CGI but it’s often unnecessarily overdone.

A little bit of a gradient in the greenscreen isn't a huge deal for professionals.

Why does feige come here to cry?

Attached: dishonest filmmaking.webm (960x540, 1.05M)

first post worst post

Good post. They don't call 'em plebbit for no reason.

There's some kind of filter on it. you can see the mucked gradiation at the top coming down into the sky like the bottom part of a circle.

Whoever does Villeneuve's special effects is some sort of wizard. That grittiness makes it work every time.

all that work on those miniatures just to make it look like CGI in post baka

>extremely limited
big studio industrial scale film making is about making components for a larger product and the more flexible these components are the better which is why they use CGI and green screen in seemingly retarded ways. This also has drains creativity and imagination usually guided by limitations out of the process.

Attached: quote-the-enemy-of-art-is-the-absence-of-limitations-orson-welles-31-10-39.jpg (850x400, 48.91K)