*gives you nightmares as a child for absolutely no fucking reason*

*gives you nightmares as a child for absolutely no fucking reason*

Attached: 34634621.jpg (1280x720, 46.02K)

Attached: 1633131779004.jpg (930x558, 28.7K)

I was not a child when I was a child so no, it didn't

>getting nightmares from fucking harry potter
lmao
try watching alien 3 when you're 7 years old

Voldemort was not nearly as evil as Putin is.

Powerful

Attached: FNo42m_agAIGYKb.jpg (1080x1080, 132.69K)

sorry that i went into this nice little fantastical adventure not expecting satan himself to appear and make me shit my pants

This, but unironically

That’s how he should have looked for all the other films. The slit nose with no bridge and no red eyes just made him look like a Star Trek alien, not threatening at all

Lmao, try watching the original uncut child's play and nightmare on elm Street at 3 years old

I think this kind of demoralization really only works on american posters

why was he on his head again? What was his plan?

I'm watching The Terror right now and it really throws me off that Blanky is the same guy as Professor Quirrell

Attached: EFIGEaoXYAEg-HZ.jpg (796x1026, 93.91K)

Are you serious? Use the philosopher's stone to get a new body. Did you not watch FMA?

No, it works on me too.

Lmao, try watching The Thing at 1 year old

>FMA
what?

not as scary as the truck scene in pee wees big adventure

The true nightmare was always being subjected to dullest franchise in the history movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: AFC7C0DA-BC9A-4355-B227-C2FADF3A060F.jpg (1300x2345, 964.45K)

lol try watching 9/11 news broadcast as a few months old baby

fuck off newfag.

try watching the bombing of pearl harbor as a sperm cell still inside of your fathers ballsack

TRY WATCHING ISIS BEHEADING VIDEOS AS A FETUS YOU PUSSY FUCKS

reminder that picture is bait

based "No!"poster

It's not bait, it's a fucking pasta probably as old as you, you fucking zoomer.

lmao try watching the future corruption and downfall of humankind from your third eye as a 3 year old Camptosaurus during the Jurassic Period and knowing you're going to be reincarnated there

Rofl try watching the Permian extinction event as a mammalian precursor

Fuck My Ass.

Sneedtin