Was Huntington right?

Brazil is not latin american.

Yes and no. I think he was right on the idea of civilizations clashing but I don't think it's gonna happen on a continental level and certainly not with those ridiculous borders. Instead civilizations will clash inside of countries. For example: mapuches are gonna clash with criollos inside of chile; russian speakers clashing with ukrainian speakers in ukraine; white vs black clashes in south africa; etc, etc.

he put turkey in the muslim world you fucking lying piece of shit euro wanna be turk
>Huntington refers to countries that are seeking to affiliate with another civilization as "torn countries". Turkey, whose political leadership has systematically tried to Westernize the country since the 1920s, is his chief example. Turkey's history, culture, and traditions are derived from Islamic civilization, but Turkey's elite, beginning with Mustafa Kemal Atatürk who took power as first President in 1923, imposed Western institutions and dress, embraced the Latin alphabet, joined NATO, and has sought to join the European Union.

he is lying
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clash_of_Civilizations

what is that one purple Buddhist country in eastern europe

>Papua New Guinea and and Guyana are "Western"

Wrong because he's dumb sheltered fucks who knows jackshit of the areas he talks about.

kalmykia

>Western cuckdom

Why are all Armenians mentally ill?

tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dosya:Clash_of_Civilizations_world_map.png

>turkish wikipedia
lmao turkshits live in a whole different reality

commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clash_of_Civilizations_mapn2.png

Armenians are not yet able to write history as they wish on Turkish Wikipedia.

Why are Turks so insecure?

based