200 spaniards

>200 spaniards
Look it up. 200. Fucking 200
200 men conquered the Aztec empire
wtf is wrong with europeans? are they superhumans?

Attached: 1652407970792.jpg (2012x864, 429.4K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sint_Eustatius
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

They had help from smallpox. Now, the British conquest of India... THAT was embarrassing for the pajeets.

no
Cortez' first expedition in 1519-20 were like 500 Spaniards + native allies
when he returned in 1521 to besiege Tenochtitlan it were like 2000 Spaniards and thousands of native allies

tell me about it
how many Englishmen?

all this cope

now that seems more realistic, fucking Wikipedia lying to me

also it wasn't an actual empire, it was basically just one powerful city

Couple thousands. They conquered 300 million pajeets kek. During the Raj, there were 250 000 indians for every Brit.

Not really lying. Natives couldn't do shit against armored cavalry. That's why Spain destroyed them so easily.

That's like saying Rome was just a powerful city in 50BC. It was an empire by any standard.

The didn’t you macaco subhuman, they lost the fist battle and then they allied with local tribes.

we defended our country for centuries with less than that

no, Rome had military bases throughout the empire and much more infrastructure, had built cities everywhere, introduced its law, etc.
the Aztec "empire" was just an area of sujugated smaller cities and tribes that had to pay tribute and switched sides to the Spaniards as soon as the opportunity arose.

The natives thought the first Europeans they encountered were literal Gods. All they needed to do was shoot their guns in the air and sneeze on them to take down the red mans "empires". The average armored Spanish man-at-arms could also easily lance a half dozen natives. Later battles in North America where both sides had guns depended largely on numbers and tactics, with which the Europeans once more had the upper hand by then.

you expect spain to have accurate records?

we had God by our side

Attached: 1649969882634.png (203x223, 45.4K)

If the aztecs repelled the spanish and took their armor they would learn how to smelt armor and make guns as well as take the spanish horses and cannons.

>an area of sujugated smaller cities and tribes that had to pay tribute
Yeah that's an empire Hans

no, more like an area of influence. They didn't have direct political control

>what if
They didn't, they didn't even know what metallurgy was. The US native Americans got guns from the British, French, and Americans and fell in love with them immediately and perfected their use but not their manufacture and thus still required trade with white man to get them and supplies for them.

We saw that Indian punani

>two Dutch people and a dog arrive in Indonesia
>five days later an area the size of five times Germany has been subjugated

>with white man
There was no organized collective called white man then.
Just random people settling with some unrelated organization doing some stuff.

>They didn't, they didn't even know what metallurgy was.
American education.

so there were 1,200 brits in India during the raj? this is obviously bs

Natives often referred to the first Europeans as a collective rather than by their individual allegiance. To them the French, British, and Spanish were basically the same.

We used to arm native Americans. And they then used our weapons to kill each other.

This is such embarrassing rewriting of history from leftards
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790

They didn't retard. They had never used metallurgy in the way Europeans or middle easterners had for thousands of years by the time the first ships arrived in America. the same phenomenon occurred in the Pacific island nations as well where most of the natives had never even seen metal before.

you really think 200 moorberians toppled the empire by themselves?
those retards didn’t even know how to build a trebuchet
when Tenochtitlán was sacked the city was ridden with corpses dead from smallpox, just look at this graph showing how catastrophic it was for the mexica. you also need to account for the 200,000+ Tlaxcalans who aided them

Attached: 28C3F131-ACA2-40FC-8340-1337459CC93D.jpg (205x244, 12.48K)

cope and seethe chicano

el CHI

Yeah once they became armed they immediately started up old wars with their enemy tribes. Some of the eastern rtibes tried to band together against the British but failed and were punished as a result.

>moorberians
that's an insult to moors.
Spaniards are stray cumdumpster babies born from many gangbangs of prostitutes.

That's literally one of the definitions of an empire.
>3. A group of states or other territories that owe allegiance to a foreign power

they were helped by natives

>Some of the eastern rtibes tried to band together against the British
That reminds me
>The British took the Andrew Doria incident seriously, and protested bitterly against the continuous trade between the United Colonies and St. Eustatius. In 1778, Lord Stormont claimed in Parliament that, "if Sint Eustatius had sunk into the sea three years before, the United Kingdom would already have dealt with George Washington". Nearly half of all American Revolutionary military supplies were obtained through St. Eustatius. Nearly all American communications to Europe first passed through the island. The trade between St. Eustatius and the United States was the main reason for the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War of 1780–1784
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sint_Eustatius