Ok if Europeans' good looks are only thanks to MENA admixture and without it Europeans would be ugly blotchy pigfaces like Finns or Balts or Russians, then how come actual MENAs are so ugly?
Ok if Europeans' good looks are only thanks to MENA admixture and without it Europeans would be ugly blotchy pigfaces...
>Balts
They're the most masculine Europeans by far. The World's Strongest Men competition is dominated by the Balts despite their small size as countries.
Lithuanians and Poles come here and live cramped in small rooms to work as builders for cheap
>Ok if Europeans' good looks are only thanks to MENA admixture
i don't think anyone says that
Yamna wasnt mena, retard that you were turkish and muslim rapebabby doesnt change the bigger picture.
they were 1/3 mena as eastern european hunter gatherer men raped and took womemes from churkas
Wouldn't it be cheaper in their own countries? Or do we have some special training facility?
>Yamna wasnt mena
you're right, they actually looked closer to north indians/pakistanis/afghans reddit.com
there wasnt mena at that era.
Im not allowed to post pics here but Examples Balts and Finns lack completely the mena admixture meanwhile having Pretty much hunter gather admixture, Also Finland tops the Yamna while not even being aryan but a Finno-Ugric Semigod.
because race mixing is good, it can create something beautiful out of 2 ugly parts.
No european is masculine
Middle Easterners don't have any Yanmaya. The only people with Yamna ancestry are Europeans with an average around 50-60% Yamna, and Indian subcontinentals with an average of 20-30%.
okay? but the churkas those women came from are also one of the main compoments of modern menanoids
> but Examples Balts and Finns lack completely the mena admixture meanwhile having Pretty much hunter gather admixture, Also Finland tops the Yamna while not even being aryan but a
yes, fino-ugrics in general have a lot of ancestry from ane from which eastern european hunter gatherer came from as well so i think they're related. i've heard there are some attempts to link the finno-ugric language family with the indo-european one
I'm trans btw not sure if it matters
Pics unrel? They clearly don't look pajeetid
That's a murder rate map not testosterone. I'm not the one to cope so I'll just say Europeans, due to better nutrition have higher testosterone than most third worlders.
Europeans mog the rest of the world in strength competitions. Not a single non white man has broken any strength based record. Blacks usually break athletic records. Browns don't even break any. Chinese do shit like table tennis and ballerina and meme games to win gold at the Olympics (other than weightlifting but they're able to do that because their arms are shorter relatively to their body size and they're only able to compete category wise not in terms of raw strength).
>Ok if Europeans' good looks are only thanks to MENA admixture
Who says this
Yeah you're thinking of yamnaya admixture, not MENA, of which balts have the highest levels, iirc. Although, I suppose the yamnaya do have some MENA admixture, still not the same as modern yamnaya turbo shitskin inbred donkey fuckers. This pic is a very brief summary of the ancestry of european people.
>Europeans
Europeans here primarily refers to what I call "North Atlantic - Baltic". That is Anglo Saxons, Poles, Germans, Baltics and Scandinavians.
The other group of Europeans that are extremely good at sports is the Dinarics (Yugoslavia) but that's due to their height advantage. They're not as bulky as their Northern cousins.
South Europeans, not very impressive physically.
Finno-Ugrics, Uralics and Samoyed were all Aborginals of those areas whose ancestors went to america and some to the East.
The good lookin ones were actually the asian ones related to finngolians (indoyuros), mongols are pretty atractive compared to your average pakistani or bedouin, mena pipox generally lacks cheekbones, have weak jaws due to agriculture, have bad teeth for the same reason, receding chins and mouth breather physiology, crooked noses, generally puffed eyes with exposed canthus and negative tilt (prey eyes), balding genes, etc.
Mongols are way better looking and also do not bald.
fake cope graph, the source literally doesnt exist
typical manlet shitskin tactics
ourworldindata.org
Bad version, ANE were Blond blue-eyed chink.
>modern yamnaya
meant modern MENA
Northerners always had to split wood with axes to survive, their body is naturally built for being strong just like some African tribes who need to run and keep fit for eras to survive. We've been building huge ass stone buildings for millennia thanks to technique and tools, we are at that evolutionary stage where the body got rid of useless stuff like "extra strong" or " extra fast", because technology has been giving us a sharp edge for quite some time now.
yes, i find it extremely interesting that europeans and native americans are related and mestizos are like two branches of the same tree rejoining
>then how come actual MENAs are so ugly?
low ANE admixture.
you'll notice that as Indian or ANE admixture increases (like in Iran), the people start getting wider jaws
It's the Gulf Arab and Anatolian DNA that causes the jawlet phenotype.
also the dude you posted is a jawlet, and there's millions of brown or even same-colored versions of him across MENA, even the western parts.
havent seen any reconstruction which claims this, but I suppose it makes a bit more sense than it appearing so quickly in the EEH + WEH intermixing. I would guess that it is fairly far from brown and black hair, so it would take a while of genetic selection to reach a full population of blue eyed + blond haired chinkoids
Yes. Civilisation really limits physical attributes. The people with impressive physique in India are people from the isolated tribes in the South. The rest of Indians have farmer physique (shorter stature and lean muscle mass) due to Indians farming for thousands of years. Farming reduced height in India by 16cm, we know this because we have pre agriculture Indian skeletons to compare with.
>Indian or ANE
WE WUZ
WHG = features like pic
the "mogging" features that incels talk about come from ANE and Iran (which has both Indian and ANE mixed into it)
Yes but it's a benefit and not a downgrade. Why would you carry extra fat if you don't need it and have food?
>even same-colored versions of him across MENA
show me a single goddamn one, ive seen like three that have blue eyes
In Global25, Indian can be used an approximation for ANE. This doesn't mean Indians and ANE are equal, it's just that the Global25 coordinates for Indians and ANEs is the same. (Has a bit to do with the fact that Indians have a significant ANE admixture as well as additional East Eurasian admixture putting them roughly near where the original ANE was while Europeans and East Asians drifted far away due to evolution).
>Europeans
We are Northern Eurasians and genetically not european or asians, almost every finnthot making from america copied dna test gets "indigenious american" just because we share same ancestors from era before they went to america via Siberia.
Yes, freak.