How much should we charge Americans for enslaving us?

Attached: 6D1E63A2-D4C0-458C-8BEE-0B44C0F07E67.jpg (1242x817, 417.6K)

Don't worry, in 20 years, human zoos will make a comeback, but they'll be filled with white people on display.

Americans truly are savages.

>tf
>tp

>tf
>tp

Did Filipino people even look that different from chicanos? Why'd they put them in zoos?

Fuck off

>monarchy does bad stuff
>gets denounced for his action during their colonial days
>today's posters still push their monarchy's blame onto the people

how was she a slave, they gave her free peanuts

That's not slavery.
People are always muhh slavery but no, it's not.
That's just fucked up people who kidnapped a small girl, tied her up to a pole and let people pay to throw peanuts at her.
That's way worse than slavery.

Are you the china spammer?

What the fuck do you think slavery is you stupid retard?
It's owning a "person" and doing what you want with them

No, Belgians are savages, even after their monarchy stopped being psycho.

Attached: Brussels Zoo 1958.jpg (640x512, 52.39K)

You guys created Josh Luna, the ultimate punishment against us.
You've already gotten your vengeance.

>It's owning a "person" and doing what you want with them
No, you owning a person does not equal you doing whatever you want with them.
In the roman empire, slaves had gained rights with time.
Saying "yeah but slaves had no right and you can do whatever you want and- whatever" is false.

>Belgians
Flemish*

Can a Roman send his slave to a Gladiatorial arena to die for his amusement?

1) not anymore
2) neither at the end of the empire
People like twisting definitions, but being someone's property and not being a person is two different things, even if in most cases, being a property and not being a person is the same thing, what OP is talking about is not slavery.
Get your head out the American non-culture user.

Josh Luna is a chinese creation to make filipinos look insane

The answer is "Yes he could". Stupid fucking imbecile.

Then learn to conjugate you "fucking stupid imbecile".
>Could a roman have sent his slave to a Gladiatorial arena to die for his amusement?
You apparently have skipped both English and history classes.

>I'm unequivocally wrong, but if I nitpick about your grammar that means I win!

You all fell for my devilish scheme

Attached: pepe-feeling-cute-happy-thumbnail.jpg (200x160, 6.8K)

>tfw you missed out tossing peanuts at the monkey people
Was born too late

Just like what they did to patrick

Dont you worry sonny. You can still watch your race get extinct

would adopt and raise in a loving environment

No, I am saying your are both stupid AND illiterate.
Let me repeat again for your brain to process.
>AHEM
Slaves in the Roman empire have gained rights with time.
So if you had a normal train of thought, you would have understand I hinted that if slaves had rights in the end of the empire, slaves 18 centuries later should also have had rights.

And you should teach your people how to sew, every piece of clothing coming from your country don't last a week.
Like your buildings.

Why did Spartacus lead the third Servile war if he had rights?

Not always for example in ancient Athens the slaves lived alright.

>tf
>tp

>Spartacus
>Empire
user, if you keep messing up the Roman republic and the Roman empire, you will have hard times to discuss those matters with people knowing what they are talking about.

Based

Attached: pepe devilish.jpg (470x595, 80.66K)

I said Romans, I never mentioned anything about timescale, you did that because you're stupid. Now answer the question. Why were there 3 Servile wars if slaves had rights? Why was Spartacus a gladiator if his owner didn't have the right to decide over his life and death?