Dude… living with every comfort conceivable made possible from the sweat and work of millions of ordinary workers and...

>Dude… living with every comfort conceivable made possible from the sweat and work of millions of ordinary workers and millions more third world people who work for a dollar a day is like… actually really hard

Attached: 8707DAD5-882A-446F-BE0C-B79D94978781.jpg (1944x2880, 1.29M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=w0Hd8R6TeR0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

A commodity as the end result of the psyop to further paint the environmental activism movement as a dangerous fringe form of terrorism by pushing memes about an mkultra victim nutjob as the most visible voice of the critique of civilization through the lens of anarcho-primitivism in the era of mass climate change awareness is so artful and impressive.

this movie feels like a hit piece, total character assassination

Impressive? No. Ignorant? Yes.

Anyone who commits violence against the innocent should be ridiculed for eternity.

>dumb kantian

>technology is the tool of the devil bro!
>what? no i can't live without my bike or typewriter

>"innocent
To Ted they were not, they were pushing technology further.

user, I think you missed Teds message, read ISAIF.

I don't know anything about this movie but I preordered the OST 'cause it's by Blanck Mass

youtube.com/watch?v=w0Hd8R6TeR0

climate change isn't real

This movie was made by leftists to ruin Ted's character and misrepresent his message.

I can't wait til you burn in hell for your crimes, Teddy.

>Leftism is a totalitarian force. Wherever leftism is in a position of power it tends to invade every private corner and force every thought into a leftist mold. In part this is because of the quasireligious character of leftism: everything contrary to leftist beliefs represents Sin. More importantly, leftism is a totalitarian force because of the leftists’ drive for power. The leftist seeks to satisfy his need for power through identification with a social movement and he tries to go through the power process by helping to pursue and attain the goals of the movement. But no matter how far the movement has gone in attaining its goals the leftist is never satisfied, because his activism is a surrogate activity. That is, the leftist’s real motive is not to attain the ostensible goals of leftism; in reality he is motivated by the sense of power he gets from struggling for and then reaching a social goal. Consequently the leftist is never satisfied with the goals he has already attained; his need for the power process leads him always to pursue some new goal. The leftist wants equal opportunities for minorities. When that is attained he insists on statistical equality of achievement by minorities. And as long as anyone harbors in some corner of his mind a negative attitude toward some minority, the leftist has to reeducated him. And ethnic minorities are not enough; no one can be allowed to have a negative attitude toward homosexuals, disabled people, fat people, old people, ugly people, and on and on and on. It’s not enough that the public should be informed about the hazards of smoking; a warning has to be stamped on every package of cigarettes. Then cigarette advertising has to be restricted if not banned. The activists will never be satisfied until tobacco is outlawed, and after that it will be alcohol, then junk food, etc. .

Attached: 1645422381327[1].jpg (650x885, 145.14K)

Tldr

What a gay little post, is that what the muslims of Baghdad said to the mongols as they were executing 2 million of them after taking the city?

>The leftist of the oversocialized type tries to get off his psychological leash and assert his autonomy by rebelling. But usually he is not strong enough to rebel against the most basic values of society. Generally speaking, the goals of today’s leftists are not in conflict with the accepted morality. On the contrary, the left takes an accepted moral principle, adopts it as its own, and then accuses mainstream society of violating that principle. Examples: racial equality, equality of the sexes, helping poor people, peace as opposed to war, nonviolence generally, freedom of expression, kindness to animals. More fundamentally, the duty of the individual to serve society and the duty of society to take care of the individual. All these have been deeply rooted values of our society (or at least of its middle and upper classes4 for a long time. These values are explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material presented to us by the mainstream communications media and the educational system. Leftists, especially those of the oversocialized type, usually do not rebel against these principles but justify their hostility to society by claiming (with some degree of truth) that society is not living up to these principles.

Attached: 1645421471319[1].jpg (610x631, 57.57K)

>technology is... LE BAD!

Attached: 1639375063089.gif (675x1200, 419.14K)

Damn. Guy was ahead of his time. Oddly enough I thought he had a left-wing bend himself.

Does he criticize the right as well?

Wasn't a fan of how the movie portrayed Ted and his motives. Still, this movie probably got people interested in Teds ideas on how industrial society is harmful to us, so I see that as a win.

Attached: 1644332180897.webm (640x360, 735.71K)

>is he consistent in his beliefs?
No lmao

There's a reason McVeigh didn't bomb his army buttbuddies.

That's a shame.

>Suppose you asked leftists to make a list of all the things that were wrong with society, and then suppose you instituted every social change that they demanded. It is safe to say that within a couple of years the majority of leftists would find something new to complain about, some new social “evil” to correct; because, once again, the leftist is motivated less by distress at society’s ills than by the need to satisfy his drive for power by imposing his solutions on society.
>Because of the restrictions placed on their thoughts and behavior by their high level of socialization, many leftists of the over-socialized type cannot pursue power in the ways that other people do. For them the drive for power has only one morally acceptable outlet, and that is in the struggle to impose their morality on everyone.

Attached: 1645443114310[1].png (475x589, 399.1K)

He called conservatives idiots for not supporting environmentalism or something.

>>The people who rise to positions of power in leftist movements tend to be leftists of the most power-hungry type, because power-hungry people are those who strive hardest to get into positions of power. Once the power-hungry types have captured control of the movement, there are many leftists of a gentler breed who inwardly disapprove of many of the actions of the leaders, but cannot bring themselves to oppose them. They need their faith in the movement, and because they cannot give up this faith they go along with the leaders. True, some leftists do have the guts to oppose the totalitarian tendencies that emerge, but they generally lose, because the power-hungry types are better organized, are more ruthless and Machiavellian and have taken care to build themselves a strong power base

Attached: 1645421941811[1].png (852x816, 535.9K)

>Any Forums calls you a bugman for liking material comforts and commodities
>says you should be happy because you have material comforts and commodities
every single fucking time you worthless projecting faggot, go walk under a truck and end your malignant life already

Attached: 1643342871881.jpg (1077x1081, 112.62K)

Seething leftoid