>this was considered ultra ripped in the 90s
Why were the 90s so unfit compared to the 80s or today?
This was considered ultra ripped in the 90s
>the more angular a guy looks the more fit he is
The only thing that was considered ripped were the people who paid to see it.
He's pretty ripped compared to the fatasses that tried to pass off as fit in the 60s
it wasn't. It's just that some actors were too alpha to get ripped for the part. Nobody dared to talk to them about it.
>Here's your bouncer bro
T-thanks!
Steroids ruined male body standards.
Now your average normie think it's realistic and attainable for your average man to be 200lbs shredded
He's in a better shape than 95% on this board
Do zoomers really think being pumped with roids = ripped?
Ironically, that's probably the most realistic physique of a man who never sleeps and is an ultra marathoner ninja billionaire master of disguise.
He looks healthy aestheticsfag
He was ripped compared to the previous Batman actors.
Swayzes tiny chest and traps never looked like they suited the rest of his physique. Wtf kind of lifting was he doing?
>try to stop me landon
Maybe it's the pose but his ribs look flared as fuck
Powerbottomimg
>this was the average thirteen year old in 1960
This isn't even a little gay. Wouldn't pass in MCU
bruce wayne is suppost to be a billionair playboy, not a body builder
No it wasn't. Stallone and Schwarzenegger were still doing movies.
This wasn't ultra ripped. Its just plausibly fit.
He's not that muscular, but he's lean and has a good frame. This is what women find attractive.
The ultimate redpill is that frame > muscles.