Why can’t modern CGI match him?
Why can’t modern CGI match him?
Other urls found in this thread:
>DreamWorks face
because they had a lot of crutches to work with to cover up the bad design like the slippery feeling and the sunlight reflectting it. It is overrated and obvious digital shit
Time, basically. If you're expected to crank out multiple CGI heavy movies in succession, you can't really devote much time to make the character as realistic as possible.
Style over substance
Turns out you need actually competent people to make your special effects look good even if you're doing them with CGI, diversity hires and pink-haired pansexuals won't cut it.
I work in CGI, and have worked on Wreck it Ralph Breaks the Internet. The way you categorize us as being incompetent is incorrect. It is often due to producers who do not allow us to do our jobs.
For the same reason modern writing can't match 60yo cartoons made for children
>It is often due to producers who do not allow us to do our jobs.
Now you've gotten me curious, in what ways do producers interfere with CGI animators?
Producers equal to shitty managers at times
they get paid or pay to be the flavor of things
Its from 2006
he... he was real
They already did
The fact that he's a character that's constantly slimey and wet helps enormously. Shiny reflective surfaces makes it way harder to spot bad CGI because of the visual noise. Same reason rainy nighttime CGI looks good.
Which ps1 game is this?
The Simpsons Wrestling
Will we ever see a major actor participating in motion capture ever again? Gollem fella doesn't count
>Will we ever se actual major actors and actual movies ever again?
fixed
Imo, he's showing his age.
looks worse than General Grevious
It's not cg they hired a squid faced freak and used makeup to make him look like the actor