What happened to female joker

>2022
I am forgotten

Attached: download.jpg (225x225, 10.82K)

tipper a cute

I liked Cruella, it was enjoyable

It's weird how they have music playing almost every second of the film though. Like a long ass music video.

>female joker
I thought that was Harley

she was a joke

>I am forgotten
user, it trends on disney plus every other month

>CLASSIC VILLAINS ARE.....LE KINDA GOOD BUT MOSTLY BAD

my fashion design gf loved the first moments when she was a kid aspiring to be a fashion designer, and even up to when she was scrubbing floors in the snooty place, but the second they started doing sci-fi shit with the bug dress she hated it. Or before with the fire bullshit. If they kept the dresses grounded in reality instead of dancing the borders of magic it could've been a more enjoyable story. Punk anarchic fashion taking down the establishment, i don't even care that she loves dogs in this one. Instead a so called anarchy girl uses magic to become the system instead of destroying it.

Attached: aj49u604hq861.jpg (640x408, 39.14K)

Gay
But also… Based
Based and Gay

its ok if you really like fashion, there's some nice references to important pieces.
But the overshadowing soundtrack, the retcon of her dog hate, and the boring villain made it a very 5/10 movie.
I want to believe that there's a somewhat darker script where the spotted dress was actually made of Dalmatian, and some woman kvetched until they rewrote the whole thing to make her 100% wholesome sympathetic girlboss, instead of so-evil-you-gotta-love-her, like Glenn Closes take on her in the 96 movie.

The return of the Panther De Ville was kino as fuck though, Neoclassic cars are underrated.

Attached: Cruella_de_Vil_Panther.jpg (4000x3000, 2.5M)

The point of the film is that she's inherently bad but learns how to choose to be good. Literally nature vs. nurture.

Did they do the same to Maleficent? never got around to watching it, and after Cruella, im scared to.

Shit, that sounds good.

I understand her complaints but it's literally a turn-off-your-brain film

I don't think it's ever established in the original films that she hates dogs, she just doesn't give a fuck about them.

Yes in the first one
No in the second one

What is the fuckin point of this movie othan than Cruella is a woman and that's marketable in whatever year this was.
There was no reason this had to be Cruella whatsoever because this character is the antithesis of everything Cruella represents. Cruella is an elite socialite who wants a dalmatian skin coat and she's so fucking greedy and evil she'll skin 101 puppies instead of being patient and skinning 20 when they mature. Emma Stone is just wacky bi-polar Emma Stone with a cockney accent and she's also apparently a badass karate kid and an extreme sports enthusiast. Fuck this movie so hard, it does nothing for anyone except some producers to shit out the bottom barrel for something to cram in theatres. Pic unrelated, an actual great representation of Cruella in live action despite being cartooney, and not "cool".

Attached: Cruella-GlennClose-EmmaStone-2.jpg (2400x1727, 886.41K)

That's not the point at all. She learns she's inherently bad and so stops pretending to be good and decides to be the baddest of them all.

it's more like she's such a psychopath that she would kill puppies just to make herself look nicer

>have a boyfriend of 8 years
>break up with him because he cheated on me in my dream
WAKE ME UP INISDE

Right, it's not a specific hatred of dogs, they're just another product to her.

it does an over the pants handjob to fashion students when it couldve at least sucked my nipples also.

Attached: flnij7cmv6q31.png (640x533, 180.05K)

why can't cars look this good anymore

>decides to be the baddest of them all
so did you miss the part where she BEGS Jasper and Horace to forgive her insanity and help her in the end of the film?

Because she needs henchmen. She doesn't give a shit about them, they're just thugs.

Hispanics and Asians in sweatshops don't care enough

that's the issue with Emma Stone Cruella because she goes out of her way to show she loves animals. It's a real bullshit move by Disney to write it off as senility by the time 101 dalmatians happens. Also if Pongo is the indian guys now, and gives birth to 101 dalmatians does Cruella age 50 years at the same time?

because they're a fucking deathtrap.

Attached: early-20th-century-accident.jpg (850x651, 164.45K)

I never thought this film would have an actual audience on Any Forums kek

Attached: frogfu.jpg (1000x540, 44.32K)

She's been deprecated and replaced with a superior model.

Attached: 250796632_445357180467241_6131029943423880549_n.jpg (1080x1350, 285.14K)

it came out on pandemic time and in theatres, plus if you're gay or have a gf you probably got dragged out to see it

>does Cruella age 50 years at the same time?
Why do you folks take the original cartoon so fucking seriously? This is a reboot, for fuck's sake

BASED TRIPS

I really liked it. But like most women, I really like dogs.

Attached: pongo.gif (384x288, 742.41K)

Sometimes the camerawork was really good, sometimes is was awful. The two leads were great though

>if you're gay
I paid to see Wrath of Man and saw that this was playing in an auditorium across the hall afterwards and enjoyed the hell out of it. Never heard of it before then.

I feel like Emma was a step behind where she could've been. I wanted an insane person and instead I got an annoying quirky girl.

You're all wrong. There was no point, they just wanted to make a cool punk movie with a marketable name

I would do the worst things to her