Why is Disney Star Wars Galaxy so empty and barren? Everything is dirty and rundown...

Why is Disney Star Wars Galaxy so empty and barren? Everything is dirty and rundown, there's anarchy and lawlessness everywhere. All the worlds are desert or have harsh climates that are barely inhabited. Giant monsters that instantly kill you are everywhere. There's no real sign of "civilization".

It feels like some sort of gigantic calamity or pandemic has swept through the galaxy and society broke down and we're in some sort of post-apocalyptic landscape. wtf is Disney/Kathleen Kennedy/whoever doing?

Attached: 2352355.jpg (1280x536, 135.35K)

Budget

Well this is a problem with the sequel movies as well (perhaps even moreso, you never see a settlement with over like 200 people in the sequel movies) and they had huge budgets.

Because it's realistic and caters to american manifest destiny and cowboy shieet

They take place on the outer rim planets dude, what would you like them to do? Have a high political drama set on naboo because it looks nicer? I dont even watch this shit and I'm capable of understanding what the fuck is going on.

because the galaxy is huge and people can only reproduce so quickly to spread out and colonize it all.

but also budget

why doesn't the floating ball have a shadow? it's at his knee's height so the shadow should be more visible

why can't we ever see a place that's not in the outer rim then? You're telling me in a galaxy with billions of world all of them are barren and depopulated and rundown? Is this Warhammer 40k or something?

no one wants to see star wars set in a city

when the main character is deliberately trying to stay off the map then it makes sense

there are millions upon millions of races spread out across the galaxy so this argument makes no sense. It's not like there's just 1 race from 1 world spreading out

you're right

its pretty clear cut canon that really only humans and outlaws are trying to spread to otherwise inhospitable planets.

idk empire strikes back seemed to do well and it had cloud city. And the prequels made a lot of money and had a lasting effect far more relevant/influential than disney stuff

when did this rule that "star wars must be set in depopuled hellscapes" get established?

probably because most of the prequels still take place on inhospitable hellscapes.

the most frequented planet in the prequels was courscant which is anything but and disney still refuses to show it.

And why wouldn't it be when it takes so little for soys to go crazy?

Attached: the soydalorian.jpg (1220x1031, 283.83K)

and courscant and naboo combined accounts for, total, significantly less screen time than inhospitable hellscapes.

this isn't a difficult concept.

Part of what made Mandalorian good was they did go to different worlds.

It looks like no one wants to see stars wars made by disney either and here we are

you mean shills.