>scorsese is a producer
>dafoe in talks
>Phoenix is back
>Twitter having a meltdown again
Jokerbros...
Scorsese is a producer
Other urls found in this thread:
formomentum.com
mwpdigitalmedia.com
medium.com
cinematicslant.com
archive.4plebs.org
nbcnews.com
nypost.com
variety.com
indiewire.com
twitter.com
jacobitemag.com
twitter.com
Todd said "no sequels"
Based
Where the fuck did this mindset of Joker being an incel movie come from? The movie is fucking leftist as fuck and the message is literally about poor people rising against elitism
Not going to be a traditional sequel. Alternate origin, basically standalone. They’re using the Joker branding as a way to make another crime drama.
There is nothing leftists hate more than poor white working class people.
I don't know what she said but I'm sure it was nice
>mentally ill white man becomes an icon for social dissenters.
Do you really believe jews?
The shills on here were trying their hardest to market this socialist trash and appealing "incel" was the only way
White liberals genuinely believe that all white people live a life of luxury and privilege and don't face any real hardships in their life. Because that's what their lives are like. To them a movie like Joker is completely unrealistic right-wing fantasy. Acknowledging it as anything else would be a challenge to their entire world view.
Have sex incel. you had been doing these for 3 years
Hang yourself and livestream it you mentally ill retarded nigger
>Walking Phoenix got to kiss Zazie Beetz and I never will
All the negative press this got was essentially just marketing.
Those aren't leftists then, are they. It's Americans
Scorsese has seen the light on capeshit kino
I still haven't seen Joker
Does it really warrant all this anti-incel screeching? Is it really an incel movie? Sounds kinda based if so
I'd like it to be like Mad Max: no clear set continuity after the first one, just simple stories with familiar characters doing outlandish things
>Does it really warrant all this anti-incel screeching? Is it really an incel movie?
its a leftist film which supports helping the mentally ill and shows how dumb and destructive conservative policy is. it is based
so the people screeching about it just haven't seen it then? Because that sounds right up twitterthots' alleys
The Joker's personal trauma has affected his ability to exist in a society that doesn't support a person like him. After a very bad turn of events he's able to find meaning in being the violent revolutionary icon the media has portrayed him as.
>so the people screeching about it just haven't seen it then?
exactly lol
Main character isn't an incel; he's not frustrated by a lack of sex or intimacy, but the lack of decency in others. He deludes himself that people are nice despite them repeatedly mistreating him. He manages the cognitive dissonance between his gentle sentiments and angry feelings by engaging in fantasies. The film story tracks his realisation that the fantasies are no real escape and make him less able to cope in the long-run. The only woman in the film he lashes out at is his mother, who it is later revealed to be a terrible narcissist and manipulator.
When you look at the Quote Retweets OP isn't lying.
So many of the posts are people saying shit like "men are about to get even more annoying" "Big day for Hetero weirdos" "incel".
But why? I literally don't understand why you see news about a potential sequel and immediately get mad at straight dudes.
Yea, part of the reason why a lot of critics especially in news outlets turned on this film even after giving it high-praise at Cannes is because the film is scathing about the media. They practically create the Joker bogeyman from scratch and Arthur merely steps into it after repeated pushing.
Because James Holmes dyed his hair red because his friend dyed his hair blue and he went to the most popular movie opening that weekend to shoot as many people as possible.
thanks for the hot twitter take op
real great, but i cant find the upvote for you my dude. big shame baka
This
formomentum.com
mwpdigitalmedia.com
medium.com
cinematicslant.com
From the first link
>Hitchcock was obsessed with every detail in the marketing of the film. Each theater received a manual with specific instructions on how the movie should be marketed. This included admitting no one after the movie began and having Pinkerton guards on hand, which stressed the shocking content in the movie
archive.4plebs.org
nbcnews.com
nypost.com
Also from the first link
>Hitchcock challenged Hollywood censors by adding more scenes with sex and violence in Psycho. For good or bad, he knew these things would become more common, not less. Movie critics and movie stars didn’t receive special treatment.
variety.com
The Phillips "woke culture" dishonesty
>There was no big budget for advertising so Hitchcock focused on grassroots marketing within movie theaters. He banked on consumer buzz not expensive television ads
They have the budget, but they also followed this:
>indiewire.com
Which led to him "trending on twitter" twitter.com
and the question that everyone would never answer and have since it all kicked off?
>why would an incel shoot up a movie made for him
AND FINALLY
jacobitemag.com
Phoenix jokes was literally worse than leto and definitely the worst jokes of the last 20 years.
Dafoe could do it so much better
Also remember when CNN claimed Trump screened Joker, but actually didn't?
>CNN’s Shimon Prokupecz reported that President Trump hosted a showing of “Joker,” which tells the origin story of Batman’s archnemesis.
>CNN (Cable News Network) is an American news-based pay television channel owned by AT&T's WarnerMedia
you just know MSM is getting ready to try even harder this time because they failed to provoke a mass shooting the first time despite their best efforts.
When everyone loved the Joker, these retarded twitter trannies thought hating them and the movie would make them look cool.