10 things the Catholic church is wrong about

You should turn off anti-aliasing when you're making these drawings.

Oh you're not catholic ?
Shame

1. the trinity is not heretical. anyone reading the bible knows that the holy spirit and logos(christ) are part of the trinity and are God.
2. Artistic representation of christ can vary. that isn't doctrine.
3. wrong the discourse about the keys and unfailing faith has to do with Peter being given authority to govern and lead the church. and the scripture mentions bishops who have apostolic succession.
4.wrong again scripture mentions a clergy(bishops, presbyters(priests), deacons) who are ordained by the laying of the hand and receive the gifts of the holy spirit. which are different from what the laity have(which is why simon magnus begged to be ordained to receive the abilities that the apostles had)

5. what does this mean?
6. no it isn't it is both scriptural and historically accurate in ecclesiology. and jehovas witness organization is based on central authority Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses which functions like a psuedo papacy.

7. then why did religion play a role in wars and politics in ancient hebrew kingdom? the high priests who supported the wars against philistines, prophet isaiah against assyrian invasion. Abraham fighting against the sumerians, hebrew invasion of canaan...ect

8.hell is not pagan its in scripture
9. in jewish culture cousins were considered sisters and brothers. the ones mentioned were children of mary's sister.
10. eucharist isn't hurtful to God, its a unitative act which unites you to Christ when receiving it.

>bro dog is like three things

>the trinity is not heretical. anyone reading the bible knows that the holy spirit and logos(christ) are part of the trinity and are God.

Untrue.

the Encyclopædia Britannica states: “Neither the word Trinity nor the explicit doctrine appears in the New Testament . . . The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies.”

In fact, the God of the Bible is never described as being part of a Trinity. Note these Bible passages:

“Jehovah our God is one Jehovah.”—Deuteronomy 6:4.

“You, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth.”—Psalm 83:18.

“God is only one.”—Galatians 3:20.

>Artistic representation of christ can vary. that isn't doctrine.

It is unlikely that Jesus’ hair was long, because the Bible says that “long hair is a dishonor to a man.”—1 Corinthians 11:14.

>wrong the discourse about the keys and unfailing faith has to do with Peter being given authority to govern and lead the church. and the scripture mentions bishops who have apostolic succession.

nowhere in Scripture did Jesus, the apostles, or any other NT writer set forth the idea of “apostolic succession.”

Further, neither is Peter presented as “supreme” over the other apostles. The apostle Paul, in fact, rebukes Peter when Peter was leading others astray (Galatians 2:11-14)

Yes, the apostle Peter had a prominent role, but so did the others like the apostle Paul and Jesus’ brother James

Whatever the case, Peter was not the “commander” or supreme authority over the other apostles

Even if apostolic succession could be demonstrated from Scripture (which it cannot lol), apostolic succession would not result in Peter’s successors being absolutely supreme over the other apostles’ successors.

Attached: bible 83 - Josiah's religious reforms.jpg (1600x1237, 217.02K)

If you hate the Catholic Church and read the Bible you’re retarded and wrong
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Rome

>4.wrong again scripture mentions a clergy(bishops, presbyters(priests), deacons) who are ordained by the laying of the hand and receive the gifts of the holy spirit. which are different from what the laity have(which is why simon magnus begged to be ordained to receive the abilities that the apostles had)

These aren't a hierarchy but different responsibilities inside the church.

We are all members of one bidy and none is superior to another, we are all brothers in Christ !

>what does this mean?

God selects a limited number of faithful Christians who, after their death, will be resurrected to life in heaven. (1 Peter 1:3, 4)

They will serve alongside Jesus as KINGS and PRIESTS for 1,000 years. (Revelation 5:9, 10; 20:6) They will form the “new heavens,” that will rule over the “new earth"

The Bible indicates that 144,000 people will be resurrected to heavenly life. (Revelation 7:4)

God promises everlasting life on EARTH for MOST good people.—Psalm 37:11, 29, 34.

Jesus said: “No man has ascended into heaven.” (John 3:13) He thus showed that good people who died before him, such as Abraham, Moses, Job, and David, did not go to heaven. (Acts 2:29, 34) Instead, they had the hope of being resurrected to life on earth.—Job 14:13-15.

The resurrection to heavenly life is called “the first resurrection.” (Revelation 20:6) This indicates that there will be another resurrection. It will be an EARTHLY one.

Attached: IMG_20220401_071108.jpg (1080x1081, 397.08K)

Burn at the stake.

You're taking things way too seriously
You should seek help

That's it I am filtering the word bible and the french flag I hope you are happy for making me change my mind on JW's from be just a bit annoying to unbearable faggots

...

Not all of us frogs are like that we are good friends I swear

Attached: apupleuree.jpg (255x253, 8.98K)

heretic cope

this level of fervor usually only leads to self-destruction or madness, especially when trying to convert people on fucking Any Forums at this modern era. Sooner or later she will either give up Any Forums for her own sanity or basically become a degenerate Any Forumstard or 4channer

>no it isn't it is both scriptural and historically accurate in ecclesiology. and jehovas witness organization is based on central authority Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses which functions like a psuedo papacy.

Incorrect. those who take the lead in religious activities should have titles that elevate them above others.—Matthew 23:8-10. So no, we do not have a pope.

In the first century, the Christian community was organized into congregations of people, with brothers assuming the responsibility to care of them spiritually: the elders. Each congregation had a group of elders to shepherd the flock.

All the congregations were supervized by the governing body in Jerusalem. It was composed of the apostles (like Peter, James, etc) and experienced christians.

They organized the communities and discussed the Holy Scriptures to know how God directs things.

We function the same as in Jesus' time. Like those faithful men, the members of the governing body are not the leaders of our organization. They look to the Bible for guidance, acknowledging that Jehovah God has appointed Jesus Christ as the Head of the congregation.—1 Corinthians 11:3; Ephesians 5:23.

They give us spiritual food like literature or talks, they translate and publish Bibles freely around the world, they assist our brothers and sisters who are victims of natural disasters, they organize the preaching of the good news, etc

These are just examples of the responsibilities they have, and they are accountable to God. But they are not our "leaders", like Catholics and their pope. They are fellow servants of Jehovah God.

Attached: IMG_20220401_071522.jpg (761x1068, 265.23K)

We have a proper catholic priest on /fr/, the dude is very interesting, unlike this zealot.
He needs to be helped.

>then why did religion play a role in wars and politics in ancient hebrew kingdom? the high priests who supported the wars against philistines, prophet isaiah against assyrian invasion. Abraham fighting against the sumerians, hebrew invasion of canaan...ect

Because these were different times and different circumstances which doesn't apply to Christians. Jesus promoted a heavenly government, God’s Kingdom. (Luke 4:43) He did not get involved in politics because he knew that God’s Kingdom, not human governments, would achieve what God wants for the earth. (Matthew 6:10)

He understood that God’s Kingdom would not operate through human governments but would replace them.—Daniel 2:44.

Jesus’ followers obeyed his command to be “no part of the world.” (John 15:19) They followed his example and remained separate from the world’s politics. (John 17:16; 18:36) Rather than get involved in political matters, they did the work Jesus commanded—preaching and teaching about God’s Kingdom.—Matthew 28:18-20; Acts 10:42.

First-century Christians put obedience to God first in their lives, but they also knew that they had to respect secular authorities. (Acts 5:29; 1 Peter 2:13, 17) They obeyed the laws and paid taxes. (Romans 13:1, 7)

Christians are not authorized to fight against their enemies. The apostle Paul wrote to fellow Christians: “If possible, as far as it depends on you, be peaceable with all men. Do not avenge yourselves.”—Romans 12:18, 19.

Instead of sending his followers to war, Jesus told them: “Continue to love your enemies and to pray for those who persecute you, so that you may prove yourselves sons of your Father who is in the heavens.” (Matthew 5:44, 45) Even when the nation in which they live goes to war, Christians should remain neutral, “no part of the world.” (John 15:19)

Meanwhile, during WW1 and WW2, Catholics killed other Catholics from different countries.

Attached: IMG_20220330_070205.jpg (1050x1062, 200.53K)

Do you have a folder with all these walls of text saved ?
For real that's crazy, JW are truly mental and I was right for never opening the door to them.

There's still catholics in France? Could've sworn most of you guys were atheist

>.hell is not pagan its in scripture

Is not

Some Bible translations use the word “hell” for the Hebrew word “Sheol” and the matching Greek word “Hades,” both of which refer to the common grave of mankind. (Psalm 16:10; Acts 2:27)

Many people believe in a fiery hell. However, the Bible teaches otherwise.

Those in hell are unconscious and so cannot feel pain. “There is no work nor devising nor knowledge nor wisdom in Sheol.”—Ecclesiastes 9:10.

Good people go to hell. The faithful men Jacob and Job expected to go there.—Genesis 37:35; Job 14:13.

Death, not torment in a fiery hell, is the penalty for sin. “He who has died has been acquitted from his sin.”—Romans 6:7.

Eternal torment would violate God’s justice. (Deuteronomy 32:4) When the first man, Adam, sinned, God told him that his punishment would simply be to pass out of existence: “Dust you are and to dust you will return.” (Genesis 3:19) God would have been lying if he were actually sending Adam to a fiery hell.

God does not even contemplate eternal torment. The idea that he would punish people in hellfire is contrary to the Bible’s teaching that “God is love.”—1 John 4:8; Jeremiah 7:31.

>in jewish culture cousins were considered sisters and brothers. the ones mentioned were children of mary's sister.

the Greek Scriptures use distinct words for “brother,” “relative,” and “cousin.” (Luke 21:16; Colossians 4:10) Many Bible scholars acknowledge that Jesus’ brothers and sisters were his actual siblings. For example, The Expositor’s Bible Commentary states: “The most natural way to understand ‘brothers’ . . . is that the term refers to sons of Mary and Joseph and thus to brothers of Jesus on his mother’s side.” (The Gospel According to St. Mark, Second Edition, by Vincent Taylor, page 249, and A Marginal Jew—Rethinking the Historical Jesus, by John P. Meier, Volume 1, pages 331-332.)

Attached: jesucristo.jpg (1200x675, 44.2K)

>We have a proper catholic priest on /fr/, the dude is very interesting, unlike this zealot.
he's probably a faggot cuck that sits on the board of various interfaith organizations where he defers to muzzoids

>eucharist isn't hurtful to God, its a unitative act which unites you to Christ when receiving it.

My point is that Jesus could not have meant that his followers were literally to eat his flesh and drink his blood.

After the Flood of Noah’s day, when God gave man permission to eat the flesh of animals, he directly forbade man to consume blood. (Genesis 9:3, 4) This command was repeated in the Mosaic Law, which Jesus obeyed fully. (Deuteronomy 12:23; 1 Peter 2:22) And the apostles were inspired by holy spirit to renew the command against consuming blood, making that law binding upon all Christians. (Acts 15:20, 29)

Would Jesus institute an observance that would require his followers to violate a sacred decree of Almighty God ?

Impossible !!!

Clearly, then, Jesus used the bread and wine as SYMBOLS

The unleavened bread meant, or represented, his sinless body that would be sacrificed. The red wine signified his blood that would be poured out “in behalf of many for forgiveness of sins.”—Matthew 26:28.

Attached: IMG_20220322_120420.jpg (1080x1076, 487.54K)

Don't exagerate, of course there are many catholics left in France.

No, as a matter of fact he is extremely radical.

France is unironically the nowadays homeplace of tradcaths of the world, but most french doesn't actually give a fuck. Catholicism is beautiful but when you start reading about it deeply you start to realize that things are much more complex than the simple superficial beauty or the words of the bible or other stuff.

I'm a zealot because...I believe the word of God ?

Attached: 1646950217855.jpg (640x512, 71.68K)

If you post your breasts right now I will convert and marry you

It’s weird you ignore my post about how the canonicity of the Bible was decided by the church you hate so much yet you use it as a source and believe it weird

Attached: images.jpg (221x228, 8.5K)

No because you search the tiniest little details to deny the honest and sincere faith to God that so many people have. This is not good, you shouldn't do that.

😱
OMG NIGGA
NO ONE CARES
go to

>He needs to be helped.
Meh, if she/he/don't know wants to, she will get help, but if she has really studied the bible for 30 years, i easily doubt it will matter anything. If anything what makes the catholic priests different from the protestants is that they have real contact with people and the world through confession different from protestants that only keep their eyes towards the bible

>1. The trinity is heretical. God is ONE.
I tought we solved that issue 1500 years ago