What is the ideal map of europe and why is it this

what is the ideal map of europe and why is it this

Attached: Europe, fix.png (1906x2200, 2.05M)

Cringe.

ew

>Roman Empire
>It's not even Roman

Attached: .jpg (911x1182, 142.22K)

you are mistaken

Attached: fixed europe.png (920x926, 94.98K)

>what is history

Hold on mate let me call the United States of America "Kingdom of Spain" cause Florida used to belong to us

The original Holy Roman Empire was neither Roman nor an empire.
Its modern equivalent serves as a buffer state between East and West. The common identity of its component states is that they are majority catholic (and mostly west/south slavic).
In full: 'The Holy Roman Empire of Balts, Hungarians, and Slavs'

>has never heard of the Holy Roman Empire

It was named Roman Empire becuase it was its successor. Naming the modern one that would make no sense

The modern one is constituted as a successor to the Holy Roman Empire. This makes as much sense as the original Holy Roman Empire regarding itself as the successor to the Western Roman Empire.

Here's the map OP meant to post

Attached: Europe_1815_map_en.png (2284x1503, 1.08M)

>All these inferior maps
Make way for the ACTUAL best map of Europe.

Attached: 8864B981-0F44-44C5-9C8B-DDBEABD40DBF.png (2284x1503, 1.14M)

>"Confederation of the Rhine"
>Most states in it don't even border the Rhine and those that do only on one side
What did Napoleon mean by this?

>HRE
>Roman successor
lmao

Confederation of things behind the Rhine.

>holy roman empire
>holy
>roman
>empire

just split it between v4 and baltic federation
it would make more sense

>Kaiserreich

Attached: 1620054838680.png (1200x1500, 639.04K)

Every cunt should have an english town style name, you know x x something something shire ton

Hello plebbit. The HRE held Rome and got its title from the pope. That's more than enough to become both holy and Roman. As for empire you probably don't know what the word means.

since when does the pope have the authority to declare roman emperors?

He's the bishop of Rome, who else in the world would have the role of crowning the Roman emperor?

the bishop of rome never had such authority

So who then is Roman if not the Romans themselves? This argument is /retarded/

>moorcels and black BVLLS in the same country
>ideal

rome died in 476
no one was roman after then