China number 1

China number 1

Attached: Screenshot 2022-03-21 at 8.01.54 pm.png (856x872, 484.45K)

Other urls found in this thread:

mobile.twitter.com/ukr_insider/status/1505842790051336196
youtube.com/watch?v=H2tuKiiznsY
bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-60819760
twitter.com/AnonBabble

USA did it.

based US. China doesn't have a hope.

Much like those people who died in the crash

Attached: 1628417076692.png (640x706, 209.96K)

>737

Attached: boeing.png (500x500, 73.01K)

Didn't Boeing fix the 737's issues?

yes, but the Chinese as always used outdated and shitty Western rejects

it's a software problem

maybe some bastard in the chinese airplane company tried to get better results by running without the fix (?)

If they said they did, I'm sure they must have.

Attached: 1642866605895.jpg (640x646, 34.58K)

>American engineering

it's a good plane, outsourcing the software is what killed it

assembly low-level programming is no joke, alot of critical things rely on it but the pay is so shit all the competent people seem to be leaving that field

t.studying in cs

Boeing thread?

Post your Boeing webms.

Attached: american_engineering.webm (960x540, 3M)

It looks like it takes a straight dive down, so it might be the software again. The absolute state of Boeing.
mobile.twitter.com/ukr_insider/status/1505842790051336196

Jesus Christ.

>it's a good plane, outsourcing the software is what killed it
This is complete bullshit, they didn't outsource anything, it was the fact that they had zero redundancy for their MCAS sensor. And the whole reason they needed MCAS was because they tried to fit a newer, bigger engine on an airframe that wasn't suited for it.

youtube.com/watch?v=H2tuKiiznsY

Do even the barest amount of research next time before you start outing yourself as a retard.

Attached: 1389708048828.jpg (640x426, 40.17K)

Attached: WEE.webm (998x720, 1.46M)

more like shit thirdie pilots

We'll Be Right Back...

It's an 800, not a max you retards.

He's probably just a Boeing shill. they're known to operate in Singapore.

Did they died?

yo what the fuck

>American plane
>Indian software
Fuck this sh*tty timeline

Why does Boeing always blame the pilot when their software fail?

Attached: fwoom.webm (640x480, 2.24M)

>don't tell pilots about MCAS because it would mean admitting that additional training is required to familiarize them with the new system
>even pilots who knew about it weren't able to correct in time because the window for doing so is literally less than 10 seconds
>blame them even though many of them (like the Indonesian pilot) were trained in America

Attached: 1645197280886.gif (480x270, 3.78M)

see Stop trying to shift the blame from Boeing's cost-cutting executives in Chicago.

Attached: booped.webm (640x640, 1.2M)

Are Canadians honorary Americans?

Attached: Screenshot_20220321-185105.png (810x739, 172.97K)

The reason for crash.

Damn that's really sad

What are these crashes? Especially the third one, curious to know if anyone survived that one.

No webm of Flight 123, but it's the deadliest Boeing disaster in history (520 casualties). But there were pictures taken from inside.

Attached: Flight 123.jpg (1181x779, 1.3M)

Not gonna go through all of them, but the 1st one was from an airbase in Afghanistan. Unsecure cargo caused the plane to crashed, killing all 7 Americans on board.

chinese niggas be like:
"oh, musto eato cato...buto firsuto, musto go to zo toileto"
...
...
...
...
BOOOOOOOM

Nah they're fine

Impressive that they managed to (land) in such a way that the fuel tanks didn't immediately ignite.

bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-60819760

>Chinese airlines generally have a good safety record: the last major accident took place 12 years ago.

Attached: 1646233858861.jpg (777x777, 233.07K)

third one was a deliberate test by boeing and nasa to study the way planes behave during a crash and its effects something like that

>only 4 survivors
Oh fug
I can't imagine how traumatic that must've been for them.

>With regard to the career path of a pilot, it takes about 2 years of prior training to become a qualified first officer. From there, it takes about another 8 years and at least 4,200 hours of flight experience to be promoted to captain
>Flight control system will now compare inputs from both AOA sensors. If the sensors disagree by 5.5 degrees or more with the flaps retracted, MCAS will not activate. An indicator on the flight deck display will alert the pilots.
>If MCAS is activated in non-normal conditions, it will only provide one input for each elevated AOA event. There are no known or envisioned failure conditions where MCAS will provide multiple inputs.
>MCAS can never command more stabilizer input than can be counteracted by the flight crew pulling back on the column. The pilots will continue to always have the ability to override MCAS and manually control the airplane.

You tryna tell me these chinesee niqqas spent 1,500 - 4,200 hours flying in 373s only to crash due to a system they can override at any time kek

Sensors are only as good as it's software, and that doesn't excuse them from legal trouble

When I said the plane is fine I guess I meant the airframe is fine.

Hey! At least its not 9/11! Right my mutts?

Ethiopian pilots followed it to the letter, they turned off the system and it was still too late to correct it.

>the airframe is fine
>it was just completely unsuited to the engines Boeing haphazardly tried to slap onto them
Based retard.

can you even recover from a 90 degrees divebomb?

Attached: text.webm (640x358, 2.04M)