Africa is is just mud huts

they copy Greek aesthetics to get more tourists

>Windhoek Namibia

Attached: windhoek.jpg (1200x630, 177.93K)

Attached: Addis Abeba.jpg (1024x840, 145.08K)

or
>Gaborone Botswana

Attached: Gaborone.jpg (2560x1707, 771.74K)

>ford ka
sovl

Both with immense poverty and slums.

its africa what you expect? its still best what real africa has to offer.

Abidjan

this city is 10 times older than those greek mainstream cliche toursitic cities, all our cities are white and blue unlike the greek ones, it's our colours. but yes when u are an american tier braindead that's what would u say, kys

No northern african cities are better tbf.

thats why i said real africa

Is that the one that was built by expelled Spanish muslims and jews?

North africa is still africa

another example of being a completely tard in a board that is suppoed to be for "international culture" the word afri till very recently used to refer exlusively to tunisia as reference to afri berber tribes, subsahareans are not african if u wanna be autistic about what the real word meant

no, that's clearly not the morisco style, the city built by moriscos are zahouan, tborsoq both in west away from the sea, morisco cities have red colors present in them, meanwhile tunisian cities are always white and blue

fake africa with muslims and deserts, real africa looks like this.

Attached: real africa.jpg (1202x718, 89.34K)

please shut up with your "own" that you think is so clever, hon hon we wuz the original africa, nobody gives a shit about historic namings, africa today refers to the entire continent, and we're but a marginal part of it in the minds of everyone in the world, including ourselves (a tunisian will still use african to refer to n words)
asia was a name of turkey, it doesn't make turkey a quintessential asian country