>THE DIVINE RIGHT TO RULE ISN'T REAL BECAUSE... BECAUSE IT JUST ISN'T, OKAY?
THE DIVINE RIGHT TO RULE ISN'T REAL BECAUSE... BECAUSE IT JUST ISN'T, OKAY?
Carson Cruz
Brody Evans
anglos were centuries ahead of them in that regard THOUGH
Connor Powell
>ABOLISH THE MONARCHY
>DEATH TO THE QUEEN
Grayson Thompson
Why do French "people" glorify an incident where poor and stupid people chimped out and killed everyone? They love this ritual slaughter so much that they've made millions of pieces of "art" about it. Even the most famous landmark in America is dedicated to it, that's how disgusting they are.
Austin Davis
>oui oui mon emperooor you have uh broken de law I must kill you with thees baguette!
Carson Anderson
We don't 'glorify' it. We glorify the republic, not the revolution. Robespierre, Danton etc... are seen as killers and criminals by all reasonable people.
Jayden Moore
>DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS IS REA-ACK
Easton Williams
You can't glorify the republic without the revolution. They are synonymous with one another; cause and effect.
Andrew Morales
'Arty bros ww@
Levi Ward
The first republic was a failure. The fifth republic was born front WWII, not the revolution. After the 'french revolution' we had decades of monarchy
Lucas Ward
Poor and stupid people supported the Monarchy and died like cucks to defend their feudal oppressors.
Jonathan Carter
It's some reactionary chud trying to look cool for all his 4chin "friends" but still claim to be a proud frenchman he is not trying to make sense.
Brody Myers
Divine Right To Rule vs Mandate of Heaven
Who did it better? (worse)
Lincoln Hall
>The first republic was a failure.
It was an unapologetic success. For the first time in European history, it was the people who rid themselves of the parasites who had relentlessly oppressed them. It heralded in the age of Enlightenment.
>After the 'french revolution' we had decades of monarchy
Are you seriously saying Napoleon is someone to be ashamed of? What happened, Pierre?
Matthew Hernandez
not really. many people supported a republic but didn't support the revolution. many others were turned to monarchism as a result.
how do you know it wasn't in their interests? you are only framing it in a way you like. nothing really changed until much later.
Michael Adams
>It was an unapologetic success. For the first time in European history, it was the people who rid themselves of the parasites who had relentlessly oppressed them. It heralded in the age of Enlightenment.
a founding myth that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. imagine telling someone who continued to be oppressed that it was fine now because this guy is in power instead.
Wyatt King
>it was the people who rid themselves of the parasites who had relentlessly oppressed them
Can't be further from the truth
It was a coup by the banking elite and the mercantile bourgeoisie
All very linked to the jews
Ethan Robinson
Yes, yes, I keep hearing that; masonic plot this, kikes that, but no one has ever substantiated any of these claims. Is it that hard a concept to grasp that the time of fattened, lazy, incompetent monarchs had passed? Napoleon proved that very thing to be true, when he consistently BTFO'd every single inept European superpower in the Coalition wars.
Imagine telling someone to eat cake when they didn't have bread.
Liam Garcia
yes. royality deserves rope.
Dominic Cox
The very concept of the Divine Right of Kings wasn't a particularly old thing in Europe when the Revolution happened. Like, wasn't the first French king to claim it Louis XIV?
Jeremiah Bennett
The french created the belief that everyone had a divine right to rule, endowed to them by their createor. Its called modern democracy. America has more an actual republic.