why are you people like this?
Why are you people like this?
Joshua Murphy
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Samuel Wilson
i agree with the picrel
Brayden Collins
I thought it was just banter though
Mason Murphy
A conventional invasion of the Japanese mainland would have killed more people than the two nuclear bombs.
Don't be silly, now.
Robert Davis
Had to happen
Ian Diaz
This. Hell, more people would have died of starvation while waiting for the blockade than got nuke'd.
Juan Ross
You're just a weeaboo bitch
Parker Allen
This, they sped up the process with incendiary bombs on major cities.
en.wikipedia.org
Mason Watson
there was no punishment too great for the japanese whoresons fake china flag
america may have many wrong decision but nuking hellfire of japan was best decision in history
in all honesty japanese got off very easy for what they did to our people. if real payback happen 50% of japanese population should have been on bayonet after war.
alas now only some old japanese should get bayonet, most are just children who do not commit crime.
but should stop glorifying japan empire in school
Jason Howard
dios mio... el chino rabio...
Evan Morris
Talk shit get hit, simple as
Ian Turner
>our people
you mean your people
I am Taiwanese not Chinese, and the Japanese only killed Chinese/Korean people
Ian Perez
american have no reference point to what jap did
it like if mexican come in country, rape your women, kill innocent baby and grandma/grandpa, burn your home, and laugh while doing so.
call you cockroaches and murder without second thought and celebrate.
japan need 100 more nuke to even get close to damage done to china
Angel Phillips
Your Nationalist Army was so retarded you flooded the Yellow River to try and drown the Japanese and ended up drowning yourselves.
Tyler Garcia
>going directly for the civilians
>better
Anglos will always justify being pieces of shit no matter what
Anthony Williams
doesn't count because you're bugs and japanese are human (sovlfvl)
Colton Gutierrez
People forget Tokyo fire bombing raids were deadlier than nukes.
Gabriel Lee
More civilians would have died too in a conventional invasion, the Japanese were preparing for a fight to the death, what's your point?
David Wilson
not enough japs burned
Christian Rodriguez
cringe. this isn't Any Forums you edge tard
Brandon Kelly
Rare chine
Nathaniel Young
utilitarian's, pragmatists, walking ideologues and other such filth
Brayden Cruz
do people still believe this was really a consideration? japan was ready to capitulate -- truman was basically tricked into nuking them against the wishes of most of his generals
Eli Morales
One probably would have been enough, oh the humanity!
Sebastian Gutierrez
>INB4 I'm Chinese. I'm a white Australian from a family that's been here since the 1850s.
US doesn't use the nukes
>10s of millions dead, Japanese language and culture utterly annihilated, Emperor killed and the country is split up or annexed by America
US uses the nukes
>War swiftly ends, Japan is occupied but given democracy, a new government and a future. Currently a successful developing country
Which is better? And no, 2 was necessary because the Japanese military tried to instigate a coup after the emperor tried to surrender on the 1st. It put them in their place
Anyone who disagrees is a weeb or a jap nationalist. If you were in the pacific war you'd want to kill as many Japanese as possible. They were horrific monsters whose cruelty was unmatched.
Nathan Baker
>japan was ready to capitulate
They refused to surrender even when the first bomb was dropped, this is basic history.