I consider Sub Saharan Africa as part of the New World

I consider Sub Saharan Africa as part of the New World
>Arbitrary colonial borders with no historical association
>Colonial European languages spoken
>Had no civilization before European contact. All it's high culture comes from Europe

Attached: 20191116_wom910.png (1280x1097, 420.81K)

>sudan
>ethiopea
>ghana
>mali
>senegal
>mauretania
had no civilisation before european contact, lol mutt go back
>they speak european language
NOPE THEY DONT, it's the official administrative language, just like in india they got hindi so everyone use one language, it's a solution that each country got like 100 min spoken languages

Both of you are wrong and you have to be 18 to use this website. Fix your history grades.

>just like in india they got hindi so everyone use one language
>he doesn't know

Attached: Bill_Wilson0.jpg (716x768, 78.79K)

>Had no civilization before European contact.
Japanese education

Central Americans and andeans had civs

Brazilian natives also had civs but extremely primitive.
They had crops and big ass huts.
Plus trails in the jungles

53% of Tunisians speak French as their primary language.

Brazil had the legendary Cloud People who were blond but the Jews from Spain killed them to stop the truth from coming out.

VGH... CARTHAGE LIVES

>North African Arab rape baby simping for Sub-Saharan Africans
What timeline did I just step into?

My ancestors were one of the first first states to have Christianity as a state religion.

Kinda. It's isn't as straightforward as you think like all those Euro language in Africa stats.

but we had a massive trading monopoly for thousands of years and we beat the portugese while you let them fuck your women

tunisia isn't a sub-saharan african country, which is what OP is about

Source?

Yeah but it ended with the Spanish conquest

nah, you have to be a sparsoid who barely had metal in order to be new world-tier.

Maybe Australia could be considered semi-new world. Africa isn't even close.

>stating facts is simping
sad state of affairs

Sub-Saharan Africa isn't considered new world because Europeans had some knowledge of it prior to colonization

Correct

>They are part of the new world
>Maintained their population
>Land was never bountiful, and ripe for the taking
>Filled with shit tons of disease, and rough terrain.
user there's a reason people there didn't develop much, and its the very same reason Euros went across the Atlantic to imperialize far before they were able to go much into Africa.