Is he right about Superman and Batman identity?

is he right about Superman and Batman identity?
youtube.com/watch?v=1IOPcfgOJpc

Attached: 1IOPcfgOJpc-HD.jpg (1280x720, 139.73K)

No, and losers like him should fuck off

Nothing's clever by pointing out fictional characters don't make sense. Wanna pretend you're better then them? Then make your own genre defining archetypes you no-business, born-insecure, jock-jawed motherfucker

Flying doesn’t make sense. Super powers in general don’t make sense.

This.

>Nothing's clever by pointing out fictional characters don't make sense. Wanna pretend you're better then them?
This doesn't make sense.

If a genre is a composition of nonsensical tropes then it warrants criticism.

The superhero genre isn't perfect...in fact it isn't even good. This is made clear by the diminishing interest by the public.

Compare it to e.g. Lord of the Rings, that have given rise to franchises like Warcraft who is far more valuable than all superhero franchises combined.

Superman’s been outed for 3 or so years and they haven’t really done with anything with it which makes me wonder why Bendis did it in the first place. Batman hasn’t really been Bruce Wayne at the same time.

>millenial/zoomer youtuber with a hot disrespectful take about a genre staple that has existed longer than he did
Pass.
What is good and valuable? Your standards for these categories are completely arbitrary and subjective.

DC is trying to get rid of Clark Kent because they're losing money to the Shuster Estate by using him and he's nearing the public domain.

Jon was a good idea because he allows DC to circumvent both of these issues. He's not Shuster's creation, and he's 80 years away from entering the public domain.

Jon’s identity is also public and he disguises himself in public last I read. Haven’t read much of his run but has he put the genie back in the bottle?

>What is good and valuable? Your standards for these categories are completely arbitrary and subjective.
They're not.

Good (in terms of a brand) means that it's appreciated and consumed by the public. Superman is a dying title of a dying market, (he hasn't had a solo title in the top 50 since he came out 9 months ago).

Valuable means that there's a lot of money is made off the brand. And Superman's value is confined to the comics (which aren't valuable) because they're not able to branch out to the movie or videogame industry with any success.

Is Minions the best animated movie ever made?