Why is this animtion considered so revolutionary?

Why is this animtion considered so revolutionary?

Attached: MV5BMTgxODE5MDgyOV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMzkyODI4NjM_._V1_SX1777_CR0_0_1777_744_AL_.0.jpg (1200x800, 157.13K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=l96IgQmXmhM
youtube.com/watch?v=jEXUG_vN540
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because retards often confuse character designs with animation.

You need to understand, this was out at the same time as Incredibles 2, Wreck it Ralph 2, and The Grinch, it was such a soulless lineup that ot elevated anything different from it

Any Forums used to have people who understood the technicals and history of their interests, now its just adults with a child's mentality that need to demonstrate how much of a free thinker they are by making idiotic statements or asking simple entry level rhetorical questions to challenge people into a debate.

It is a simple question.

check this out - youtube.com/watch?v=l96IgQmXmhM

youtube.com/watch?v=jEXUG_vN540

Because normalfags have a really shitty and tiny frame of reference

Spider-Verse did nothing new

In an age of cookie cutter CGI where Illumination cashgrabs made by unpaid interns reign supreme, Spiderverse had a ton of talent from all over the animation industry coming together for a project that grabbed all the little different bits of the 3D+2D techniques and perfected them into something that truly stood out among the rest. There are other animation projects that followed similar footsteps (Klaus and Arcane come to mind, both of which spent years in development) but Klaus received an underwhelming debut, and Arcane wouldn't release until much later.

I gave it a shot because everyone was raving how awesome Spiderverse was. I made it ten minutes in. Miles Morales is just insufferable.

That's a lot of words to say "they took Alberto Mielgo's art style and put Disney-designed characters in it"

>(Klaus and Arcane come to mind, both of which spent years in development)
Both were being made before Spider-Verse was ever shown off and both are vastly more impressive achievements for animation, including Mielgo's work like in Love Death Robots

Attached: 456.webm (1280x720, 2.94M)

Exaggerated swagger.

Attached: 22FB35B3-C962-4213-B6E1-207FBB12CEED.jpg (1284x1563, 1.02M)

and yet it's more distinct than anything Disney for so long, who has aped the Frozen's animation and design style for literally 10 years straight now. Even Lightyear, despite intentions of being a slow, realistic drama, has characters that spaz out and look like Fortnite characters.

Attached: Spider-Man.Into.the.Spider-Verse.2018.1080p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H264-FGT_10.webm (1920x796, 2.82M)

Attached: Spider-Man.Into.the.Spider-Verse.2018.1080p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H264-FGT_12.webm (964x400, 2.72M)

Attached: Spider-Man.Into.the.Spider-Verse.2018.1080p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H264-FGT_16.webm (964x400, 2.71M)

I genuinely believe this movie is helping to ruin modern day animation.
Everyone is trying to rip it off without understanding what was actually done, and now fucking everything moves at 5 frames per second. I hate it so God damn fucking much.

what examples?

It looks good and non-generic.

>It looks good
No

>and non-generic.
It's about to

Attached: 9832.jpg (1200x1200, 540.93K)

it confuses viewers into cheaper animation

Because it’s an entire movie that’s supposed to be a love letter to a franchise it clearly hates