What went so right?
What went so right?
Charles Miller
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
Carter Rodriguez
Imagine if 3 didnt have venom or the emo bullshit and was successful. We would've had Campbell Mysterio. The pay off
Liam Gutierrez
Nickelback
Brayden Green
Early 2000s naiveté and SOVL.
Sebastian Baker
no expectations and a director that loved the source material
Oliver Howard
Venom was the best part, it was Sandman who was unnecessary
Owen Butler
It's a drama movie disguised as a superhero film
youtube.com
Kayden Johnson
Time. Hated on release, but nostalgia hits hard, and over time the series became loved. Happens with so many movies. You can see it happening right now with Man of Steel.
Dominic Nelson
Soul, soul is indescribable but this trilogy is full of it.
Christian Perry
>Hated on release
All three movies sold extremely well.
John Howard
I know.
Joseph Baker
so much soul and a lack of making fun of itself. It can be corny but these movies took themselves seriously and felt genuine, especially the first two and it's characters. People want to shit on the Peter MJ stuff but it worked for me and was cute
Owen Bailey
It was a romantic dramedy first and a superhero movie second. It actually built up relationships and characters.
Jaxson Murphy
Heart and Sam Raimi is a competent director.
Kayden Brooks
>Hated on release
Only the third one
Sebastian Reyes
THEY SAY THAT A HERO COULD SAVE US
Noah Scott
this
Daniel Adams
>venom or the emo bullshit
so the good parts?
Isaac Nguyen
>or the emo bullshit
S-M3 has no emo bullshit.
Zachary White
The real thing that sucks about 3 is retconning Uncle Ben's death so that Peter wasn't responsible anymore.
Brody Evans
1 is pretty great, 2 is the GOAT superhero movie, and 3 is just meh but not so bad if you're just in it for certain scenes that tie up the trilogy, primarily related to Harry
Also I loved No Way Home but largely just due to it being a pseudo continuation of some of the Raimi arcs
Joshua Hughes
>Spider-Man 1 - Perfect comic book origin movie. Even when it takes liberties on aspects from the comics, essentially understands and encapsulates the soul of the Ditko/Lee/Romita era of the comics (especially Romita). Manages to both be dynamic and cheesy, but also gives everything weight and a sense of urgency.
>Spider-Man 2 - Continues to hit major aspects/feelings in the Romita/Lee era, and does a perfect job continuing the story and letting Peter and Harry grow as characters. While Otto’s interpretation is different, he works as an amalgamation of Spidey’s enemies, and works as the antagonist. Movie also gives us more insight into Peter and the decisions he has to make.
>Spider-Man 3 - Actually does a lot wrong, but Franco played HarryGoblin really well when he had the chance to, and Sandman’s scenes were top notch. Also, really underrated score.
Overall, Raimi captured what Spider-Man ultimately represents, and did a great job condensing it.
Benjamin Torres
That sounds like a personal issue, I loved 1 and 2 the moment they came out.