Everyone praised the shit out of this art style

I remembrance that Moana was supposed to use this and Feast's rendering system but the director ended up nixing the concept because they felt the water didn't look "real" enough so they just ended up using the same art direction as Frozen instead.

Attached: Feast_Gif_1.gif (600x250, 2.85M)

>costs too much money to make or takes too long to produce
That's not the fucking reason.
Investors are just bumbling fools, they look at what is popular now and want to milk more of it.
Costs and length don't matter, lots of shitty, expensive, lengthy projects exist that tanked and failed because investors are retarded boomers who hoarded their wealth like pigs hoarding shit.

>usually because it costs too much money to make or takes too long to produce
Traditional animation is cheaper than 3d animation and cel shaded rendering is faster and more efficient than standard rendering. You are wrong on both accounts

It's kind of the converse version of paperman. Where paperman was 3d with textures and lighting to look 2d, Klaus is 2d with lighting and texture to look 3d.

Critic opinions don't actually matter

There are dozens of animations in this style

You're so out of touch with the way the world works. For every 'bomb' as a result of shit you say, there's 10 projects that do wonderfully just like they want.

like?

You know just because some jew producer who doesn't belong in his position says that doesn't make it true right?

it's not beanmouth, too hard to animate for today's animators

Trying to make 3-D look 2-D usually doesn't do it for me. I really didn't enjoy it in the Chip N Dale movie or The Bad Guys