Any Forums Btfo

Any Forums Btfo

Attached: CC4CBEDB-44BD-4042-8089-5E4A96202FE3.jpg (2048x773, 299.42K)

i didnt see it because i dont watch trash though

What a disgusting cope

>"I wish that there was more 2d animation."
>"I agree, it was a bad thing that there wasn't any major 2d animation."
>"What are you, some kind of corporate shill? Are you a union scab? Are you working hundreds of children to death in factories? Why did you violate the Geneva convention?"

>or it's because they wanted to be more cost effective
You can see which scenes used mixed 2D and 3D animation. Such as when they're holding props like cups.
But I concede it's not very cost effective to make a throwaway cash grab with actual 2D animators when you can just use your existing 3D animators to do all the legwork.

Brevity is the soul of wit, retard.

nothing he just said contradicts what the first guy said
in fact it reinforces it

Imagine simping for Yidsney.

I actually really enjoyed the chip and Dale reboot movie. Don't know why so many people rag on it.

Attached: images (35).jpg (1175x1763, 416.82K)

>yeah I'm a manchild but at least I care about the poor animators okay?

>I'll take Fortnite Chip over burning out animators
You mean the animators they didn't hire because they didn't need as many of them because they did minimal 2D work in the movie?
I'm sure those animators appreciated the fewer job opportunities.

Attached: 1545672847283.png (878x510, 881.85K)

How come his argument changed from saving the corporation money to overworking animators midway through

don"t 3d animators also get overworked?

Riddle me this webcomic strawman
What do YOU think the animators would've preferred for this hm? Do you think they didn't still get burnout for this dreck? That it was somehow "easier" to poorly animate Chip instead of taking the time and effort for proper 2D?
You assume these decisions are artistic or benifit the creator/worker when in actuality they exist because Disney doesn't care and simply just wanted the thing out the door the fastest way possible.

Half of the animators likely resented working on this, but had no other choice, because the studio views them as replacable and if they aren't willing to fall in line, they can get someone in their job that will, and nobody is going to risk their livelihood for a shitty meta reboot of a 30 year old Disney afternoon cartoon.

Attached: 1635223563290.jpg (713x840, 536.44K)

Yes, they do and it's very often, he's just being a strawman.

The reality is that CGI artists are often not unionized, so it was both a cost cutting measure by Disney and artists still got overworked and underpaid.
The guy in the comic is a fucking idiot

>words words words words words

They used 2D Animation in Who Framed Roger Rabbit in 1988 with a 50.6 Million Budget.
Rescue Rangers 2022 was made with a $70M budget.
So much for being cost effective.

Not to defend the comic in the OP but 50.6 million in 1988 is significantly more money than 70 million in 2022

Yeah, it would. Conversely, it probably would've made a lot more money than Rescue Rangers, though.

This

>it is okay for the BILLION DOLLAR CORPORATION to be lazy and cheap

Good grief. When did Millennials become such bootlickers?