Don't design ladders.
Don't design ladders
Christian Green
Owen Hughes
>Lol just put more shit on your character
Asher Morales
Brayden Fisher
Better tell that to professional sports teams
Eli Ward
Literally no one does this. Seriously. I challenge anyone to find an example of anyone drawing a "ladder" to design characters excluding the guy who made the original image.
Jonathan Mitchell
meanwhile on TV ....
William Young
I am not one of the minimalism cultists. But there is power in symmetry and simplicity. The left is a better design. "ladders" can be a great boon to a design.
Jace Torres
I don't understand what the point of the ladders are for, I thought it was only for drawing figures in proportion or for perspective. Does it have other uses for character design?
Joseph Adams
whatever you say, dobson
Cooper Lewis
That ladder on the right is shit. How the fuck do you climb that? Person who made this definitely shouldn't design ladders.
Anthony Campbell
Anthony Powell
>But there is power in symmetry and simplicity.
Debunked
Starbuck logo says otherwise
Mason Johnson
I don't even know what this is trying to say. The so-called 'ladder' is just so you make them proportioned enough, it has nothing to do with detail.
Chase Reed
Why did season 2 have such an off colored spongebob? He's so beige compared to literally anything else before or after
Aaron Lewis
>Firefox be like:
Jack Kelly
More like don't design shitty androgyne dudes
Kevin Reyes
it just gets tiring hearing these nobody artists act like they have any respect outside of whatever circlejerk they attended last tuesday.
Logan Peterson
I already told you that I am not a minimalist cultist. I hate that shit. But that doesn't mean that there is no power in symmetry and simplicity. Just don't be a total buffoon by going to ridiculous extremes.
Brandon Price
This. You can tell this bitch is straight out of a no-name art school.
William Lewis
Spongebob actually does adhere to this principle, the difference is that there’s an actual focal point. The way OP's image is drawn your eyes are naturally led to the figure's thighs instead of his face
William Scott
Spongebob is actually a good example of what the OP image is trying to say, each part of him is a different size. You have his main sponge body, then a small section for his shirt, then a slightly larger section for his pants, then the length of his legs. This has nothing to do with how detailed a character is, but rather how the different sections of their body are uniquely proportioned to make more visually interesting characters.