BTFO's your entire comic

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy a good dunking-on of Garfield, but I really hate Lasagna Cat because it feels the need to hit below the belt and get personal. Making fun of Garfield is one thing but they repeatedly bring Jim Davis into it and insult him directly and call him talentless. It's really uncomfortable to watch. Artists attacking other artists is really shitty especially when both of them understand the struggle of getting ideas out there. Jim Davis was trying and failing to get into the comics industry for many years before he sold Garfield, he didn't just have his success handed to him on a silver platter. Likewise, Fatal Farm was making content for years before Lasagna Cat became their first major hit.

The pipe strip video and the sex survey were funny, but the rest were all eh to me

Thanks to the way back machine, I can enjoy Fantasy Boy John Arbuckle's photoshot till the Internet goes down!
web.archive.org/web/20170320100700/http://shampoofantasy.com/

What I hate is the idea that Jim Davis created Garfield as a get rich scheme which stems from a misinterpreted headline of a clickbait article. If you look at works like "Garfield: His Nine Lives", or the fact that he refused to put Arlene in the Garfield and Friends cartoon because they couldn't animate her properly, or his attempts to get the film "Garfield's Judgement Day" off the ground being pushed back studios didn't consider the film family-friendly, claiming that Garfield is a product made completely devoid of any passion is pure ignorance.

Attached: 1980-11-22.gif (1200x348, 138.03K)

>AND I SAID “WHAT ABOUT

I think that’s more so the people who watch lasagna cat that are the problem anyway. Fans turned something that was meant to be a stupid shitposts series into some deep deconstruction all so they can sound smart about disliking Garfield.
There’s nothing special about hating Garfield or saying that it’s not funny, and I frankly think that Jim Davis doesn’t give a shit if some people online hate his comic.

I can think that having passion for your creation and using it to make tons of money can coexist, but you aren’t wrong that people seem to usually act like the latter is the reason why Garfield exists

I think with Garfield, the issue is it’s mainly a newspaper comic. It’s pretty uncommon for someone to go back and read old collections of newspaper comics (unless you’re already a fan)
It’s like, imagine if it was relatively uncommon for tv shoes to ever rerun and/or to watch old episodes of tv shows. The Simpson would then primarily be judged by how it is over the last twenty years, rather than by how it was in the first ten. That’s Garfield’s situation

Is this one of those porn parodies? But for furries?

youtu.be/NAh9oLs67Cw

BREAKFAST WITH GARFIELD

Anonymous.

Anonymous who?