"It's fun."

>"It's fun."
>"As long as it's entertaining, it's good."
These opinions are absolute dogshit. They show a lack of media literacy as well as help to kill art and intellectualism in general.

Attached: 1648042384283.jpg (569x428, 24.55K)

This thread again?

Attached: FQJ1gSEX0AIaLjZ.jpg (1080x1582, 170.63K)

The problem with media literacy fags is that they think the only tolerable way to engage with some artistic work is to obsessively find some meaning in it like a schizo even when the creator themselves didn't intend there to be any
>B-BUT DEATH OF THE AUTHOR
At least you admit it's all in your head.

Yes, user, I too like Ligma and Sugondese with a dash of Candice

Attached: Alfred.png (961x721, 706.03K)

>Analyzing stuff and using your brain is bad because....

true

Nice reading comprehension
>The problem with media literacy fags is that they think the ONLY tolerable way to engage with some ARTISTIC WORK

>media literacy
>intellectualism
>posts on Any Forums
fuck off

And what other way is there? Mindlessly turning your brain off? Analyzing stuff is good. It contributes to better creativity and critical thinking.

Imagine you owned a restaurant. You hire staff, order ingredients, etc. You open it up for business. Customers come in, they order food from you. Let's say half the people who order tell you something to the effect of "It doesn't taste right, I don't like it." Well sure, you can insist that the feedback isn't to your standard, you could be a sperg about it and scream back at them, but if you ignore this many people telling you something is wrong you can expect to your restaurant to fail within the month.
Could an user be more specific about what's "fun" or "entertaining", yes and they probably should. But if everyone tells you your shit is awful and unfun, I'd try to find out why instead of being an uppity fuckhead with your head in the sand.

Jerry from Totally Spies?
also: KKK catpcha

Are you trying to be pretentious with a fucking simpsons memepic?

>Analyzing stuff is good. It contributes to better creativity and critical thinking.
I analyzed your post and conclude that you are a nonbinary child rapist.

These threads don't even make sense because people here don't judge a work's quality by how fun it is, they deem quality by how not woke it is.

Family Guy>the simpsons
all era's

There's a stark difference between critically analyzing something like the works of Tolstoy versus analysing the plot of TMNT as an example. Not all media is created equally and is equally deserving of critical thought.

That's a bad comparison because you're not the one telling the author to make the art for you. Unless you're getting a commission of some kind. You're not ordering art. The art is already there. Food isn't one of a kind. When you go to a restaurant you expect the same thing that you see on the menu, and would be rightfully dissatisfied if what you get isn't what's on the menu. With art, there is no menu. Each work of art is something new. So unless you plan to make your own art, it's the artist's job to determine what might make you satisfied, and in doing so must create something unique.

Umm, what? Criticism isn't okay for certain pieces under your arbitrary rules? All art should be judged under the same metrics.

The art is there, being shown to the consumer, because the artist,presumably, wants to make money. Do you think the networks just wanted to hand out free shows to simpletons like yourself? The menu is the channels/websites/etc. The shows advertise what they contain (comedy, action, drama, etc.) The creators want money, the customer wants something in return, you absolute dipshit. Hey, if you want to be some autist on Deviantart giving out your sonic hentai to everyone freely and pretending it's high art go for it though.

this is what consooming shit the MCU does to people

Not everyone is going to have the doctorate in pretentious cuntology required to put into words why something is good. That doesn't mean good writing and art aren't important and having an effect, it just means they don't know why it does.

>agree that there should be more media literacy because people have the stupidest takes on really basic storytelling and its actively making things worse when artists have to dumb their shit down for those same people
>at the same time everyone who talks about media literacy will in the same breath drop the most retarded take about how some hero's journey story is actually pro socialist anti neoliberal whatever the fuck, or completely miss the mark on why people don't like some shitty reboot and blame it on racist white men

Attached: 1645666026274.gif (600x432, 3.92M)

Oh, you again retard? How long has it been, a month?

Unless you're getting a commission, the customer has no input on what art they make. You're falsely equivocating these two things, retard. The moment that the artist cares about the feelings of the people, he stops being an artist.

>implying people haven't gone to see stupid plays about drunk satyrs since the dawn of time
If we were on a cave you'll be complaining about silly hunting tales instead of your high brow shamanic creation myths

The customer absolutely has input you buffoon, if you think otherwise then you're even dumber than you sound now. You'd be making these supposed longwinded reviews to no effect. Imbecile!
You want a burger? You to a burger place, order one, and consume it. You want to watch a show? You go to the website/channel/theatre, make a selection, and watch it. Now, we imagine these creators are going to continue making more of their show/burgers, but if it's shit they'll go out of business. They take feedback. Do you get it yet? Did it need to be so painfully spelled out for you?
You pretentiously whine about feedback that lacks details, yet you're so dull witted you can't understand basic analogies.