So what are your predictions for Marvel's Civil War III?

So what are your predictions for Marvel's Civil War III?

Attached: Iron-Man-and-Captain-Marvel-in-Civil-War-II.jpg (960x500, 74K)

I hope it forever cripples Marvel comics.

Carol is right again, just like the first two times

Attached: 1646789302619.jpg (423x557, 114.08K)

Spiderman and the Hulkling fight about if all jews should be killed or if instead super heros need to be liable for damages they create when fighting super villians who they let escape the first time

If we're following patterns, it'll be Carol, on the correct side this time, going up against someone like Thor.

Tony of course has to represent one of the 'sides' again. Doesn't matter if it aligns with the views and sentiments he has expressed in the previous two wars.
Also it HAS to end in a way that completely invalidates the entire reason the war started in the first place.

krakoa gets fucked and sinks in to the ocean, all the muties come crawling back to humanity begging to be let in.
one side thinks they should be allowed in because it's the humane thing to do, the other thinks they should be carefully vetted because krakoa was harboring murderers and terrorists just because they were mutants.
the humane side will be depicted as right, the vetting side will be shown to be inhuman monsters who use supervillains to round up mutants, but the tie-in comics will paint it with a bit more nuance
it'll be written by cates or aaron, so it'll be badly researched, poorly written and with no editorial oversight to fix dumb shit

>krakoa gets fucked and sinks in to the ocean, all the muties come crawling back to humanity begging to be let in.
>one side thinks they should be allowed in because it's the humane thing to do, the other thinks they should be carefully vetted because krakoa was harboring murderers and terrorists just because they were mutants.
Unironically a more understandable topic of controversy than ether of the existing wars. I can understand arguments for both sides.
Instead of
>Guys, let's centralize all our information within a organization that has and continues to be infiltrated by the enemy
and
>Let's pretend this is the first guy we've ever met who can see the future and act like it's a game changer suddenly

after disney buys dc it will be dc heroes vs marvel heroes

Dumb bitch picked the retarded side both times.

At this point, why not?

>Carol is right again
She's so right that she became a full blown gestappo fascist bitch. She even got the haircut for it.

First one was Steve and Tony, second one was Tony and Carol, third one has to be Carol and someone else.

I propose Carol and Wanda for maximum butthurt bitchfest.

>Civil War 1 is Steve vs Tony over superhuman registration but it's actually an allegory for gun control or for a military draft
>Civil War 2 is Tony vs Carol over a guy with precognitive powers but it's actually an allegory for racial profiling somehow
Civil War 3 would need to be Carol vs Steve to complete the trilogy, though Thor or Wanda leading one side would be a more interesting change.

>Let's pretend this is the first guy we've ever met who can see the future and act like it's a game changer suddenly
Remember how the plot to #1 of Civil War 2 leaked, everyone pointed out this problem, but all Marvel did in response was change his name from "Homer" to "Ulysses".

>Civil War 3 will be about whether it's OK to wear Nazi uniforms and swastikas, Carol will spend the event in a leather SS uniform, and putting people in bondage

Civil War - Superhuman registration
Civil War II - Arresting people before they committed a crime and thus preventing the crime from ever occurring
Civil War III - Aborting people from existence before they were ever born thus preventing them from committing any crime

Attached: thanos none of that makes any sense.jpg (249x269, 48.42K)

So basically Europe and their Muslim problem.

>Civil War III - Aborting people from existence before they were ever born thus preventing them from committing any crime
To add to this
>aborting baby's who might be a treat to all
>there is a preggo that shows stupidly reality altering or whatever powers
>but guess fucking what it's the fucking baby that's doing all that
>the baby could be a mutie, inhuman or whatever stupid shit we could come up let's say it ALL ABOVE ONE child aka Jesus
>everyone shits their pants cuse a fucking unborn is doing all that
>shit starts
>one faction is all about aborting the baby cuse it's a fucking menace to the universe fuck that all the multiverse
>one faction say its wrong to kill him cuse it's a unborn and has no concept or right or wrong and may be do more good at the end
>and then everyone who just wants the baby cuse reasons

Who's leading the pro-abortion side?
Who's leading the anti-abortion side?
Who are the parents of the super-baby?

Don't even joke about that user. Don't even joke.

If a Marvel event or character doesn't heavily involve an X-gene or the power cosmic I couldn't give a fuck about it

>an X-gene
I miss the days before that stupid concept.

>Introducning the new superhero: Preg-Go!
>With the power to abort babies Through time!
>It's your body, but it's not your choice!

Civil War 3 would have to be Riri vs Whor.