>Batman contributes nothing to the world he's in.
>All Batman does is beat up on the homeless and mentally ill
>Bruce Wayne should use his money for better things like helping to improve the city he's in and not hoarding wealth and technology for himself.
Can someome explain how any of these takes are wrong?
>Bruce Wayne should use his money for better things like helping to improve the city he's in and not hoarding wealth and technology for himself.
Because he does do that, as people point out with examples literally every time this dumb fuck retard argument comes up.
Oh sweet a bait thread.
Batman has saved the entire city from death and destruction multiple times over in ways that only he is capable of doing
Bruce Wayne contributes to the community by paying his taxes and making charitable donations. Defining all criminals as homeless and mentally ill is disingenuous and the only people who do this actively make their communities worse by allowing criminal behavior to fester. And he already does that. You are retarded. Now make a thread about how Superman should sacrifice his every single waking moment in service to others while in the real world you do the bare minimum to help your fellow man you faggot.
sigh bait but at this point some one need to copy and paste this
>All Batman does is beat up on the homeless and mentally ill
no he beat up
rich crime lords: Penguin, Black Mask The Falcons, the Maroni, Two Face, Bane
Homicidal serial killers: Joker, Scarecrow, Mad Hatter
Mislead villains whom he goes easy on: Catwoman, Mr. Freeze, Poison Ivy
and even then Batman tries his best to reform and aid these monsters (actually paying for Nora stasis & Dent's therapy, offering Arnold Wesker a job after doing his time & incorporates environmental and social ideas to deal with issues Ivy & Selina has)
>Bruce Wayne should use his money for better things like helping to improve the city he's in and not hoarding wealth and technology for himself.
Like every single time this get posted there are 100 of people that point out THAT HE DOES. He consider both Bruce Wayne & Batman a two prong attack against injustice. He call Gotham favorite son because of how much he does for philanthropy. The only people that say he doesn't do any good as Bruce wayne is the same one who suck the dick of the Miller edge lord "BATMAN IS MY REAL FACE" Batman who doesn't act
type "sage" in the options field if you're going to stoop down to the level of replying to a bait thread.
Wow, OP, are you like some kind of deep thinking philosopher or something? Literally no one ever has ever had that take on Batman it’s so original. While I have you OP I had this far out idea that maybe Bob from Bob’s Burgers is in a coma or something and everything on the show is in his head what do you think of that radical take?
And yet, by tightly controlling the advancement of science and technology and turning every super genius into a tech hoarder, humanity is now almost entirely at the mercy of capes, supervillains or clandestine government groups.
Name me a single cape that hasn't: spied on people he doesn't have legitimate basis for suspecting, used excessive force, seized property, gambled with the lives of innocents, trespassed on private property.
As well, the vast majority have allowed their personal issues to influence their duty to the detriment of innocent people.
Your post is only pointing out more and more why capeshit is dumb. Hero's are not people who fight a "bad" guy, they're someone who achieves an enlightenment that improves their surroundings after experiencing strenuous effort to grow. That problem is typically personified, but beating up the personification of crime doesn't actually tell you, a random nobody, how to solve crime. Vigilantism and mistrust is a bigger nuisance rather than a solution. It's why people don't respect capeshit: It's pointless masturbation. It's completely detached from solutions or anything useful. In the case of attacking criminals it's actually encouraging more problems for the people actually trying to solve crime.
What you're describing is from the perspective of neitzchean slave morality. You do not conceive of values on your own, you exist as a member of the masses to constantly subvert and deconstruct the authentic values of the strong who protect you, to constantly try to bring them down to your level of weakness through guilt and shame. The strong can save your life several times over and it will never be enough because you gladly accept your role as the weak who are inherently meant to be protected, to the point where you now feel entitled to it
Imagine being OP having literally nothing else to do with his time than to repost tired out casual Facebook memes of Batman "issues" instead of making real productive threads people can actually engage in.
OP you make me sad
So if someone does a number of "good" actions, people should accept egregious transgressions on them for free?
>>All Batman does is beat up on the homeless and mentally ill
I'm willing to bet that most of the leftist fags who argue this probably never experienced crime themselves.
If they were victimized by criminals, they wouldn't play psychologist. They would most likely cry and call the cops, regardless of how they larp about hating them.
I'm not even Any Forums-brained or anything. Rightists are retarded too. This is just what I observe.
That’s why Jace Batman is taking a different approach
You accept having your life and city saved multiple times for free, don't you?
If they're incompentent and their actions also result in people being hurt, then I'd rather someone more emotionally stable do the job.
he commits the crime instead of stopping the crime
If Batman was incompetent, the entire city would be destroyed and everyone living there including you would be dead several times over. Batman also isn't a "job" that other people can just do, it's a role he created himself.
Let me guess, you're the guy that's throwing shit at Superman after he saved the planet from an alien warlord because a bridge got destroyed, aren't you? Petty subversive slave morality at its finest
>Obfuscation plus more thought terminating cliches.
That is a ridiculously broad umbrella... that would still be rejected by like 45-55% of the US population.
Yes. Capes are independent unreliable agents in the first place. A public standardized weapon loadout would deter crime by bolstering police, private security organizations, and private citizens.